Categories
Science

The Denial of Adverse Event Risk Following Immunization and the Loss of Informed Consent – A Perspective

Here I link to a very long article that is worth your time reading. It is well researched with many supporting published scientific papers supporting the claims. The following was written by K. Paul Stoller, MD, FACHM, Fellow American College of Hyperbaric Medicine.

“Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information…The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.” 

2005 UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights1

Introduction

Vaccines are public health measures that are not evidence-based as portrayed by authorities such as the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).  For example, despite political propaganda to the contrary, the scientific reality is vaccines are not subjected to the same kind of clinical trials as other drugs are. They are classified not as drugs but as biologics, which  allows them to be routinely approved and mandated with little to no evidence of efficacy or safety while at the same time actual evidence of vaccine harm is systematically ignored by vaccine manufacturers and authorities who work together under multiple unethical conflicts of interest. Consequently, vaccines are a grave threat to public health and medical ethics. Furthermore, informed consent in vaccination is deeply endangered today both in medical practice and as an ethical principle in society.  Natural immunity is similarly endangered today due to modern vaccination policy.  Promoting categorically unsafe vaccines and discouraging the responsible development of natural immunity has become state-sponsored policy where the policy itself is what gets protected – not the public.

In the US, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated their policy on this issue clearly, “any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.” This was recorded in the Federal Register (vol 49, No. 107) and made specifically about the polio vaccine.

The heart of informed consent involves
comparing relative risks, based on actual data.

Read the whole article here https://www.townsendletter.com/article/441-loss-of-informed-consent-adverse-event-immunization/

By John Gideon Hartnett

Dr John G. Hartnett is an Australian physicist and cosmologist, and a Christian with a biblical creationist worldview. He received a B.Sc. (Hons) and Ph.D. (with distinction) in Physics from The University of Western Australia, W.A., Australia. He was an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Outstanding Researcher Award (DORA) fellow at the University of Adelaide, with rank of Associate Professor. Now he is retired. He has published more than 200 papers in scientific journals, book chapters and conference proceedings.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s