Categories
COVID New World Order Politics vaccines

Why is there little research on coronavirus therapies?

According to the dictionary the meaning of the word ‘therapy’ is the treatment of disease or disorders, as by some remedial, rehabilitative, or curative process. Why then are doctors who promote re-purposed off-label drugs with which they have achieved incredible success curing patients who have contracted the COVID-19 disease from the China virus? Such drugs as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have been demonised and in some cases declared dangerous.

On Jan. 30 , 2021, the New York Times published an article, “How the Search for COVID-19 treatments Faltered While Vaccines Sped Ahead.” The article bemoaned the fact that “nearly a year into the coronavirus pandemic, as thousands of patients are dying every day in the United States and widespread vaccination is still months away, doctors have precious few drugs to fight the virus.”

According to the NY Times:

“The government poured $18.5 billion into vaccines, a strategy that resulted in at least five effective products at record-shattering speed. But its investment in drugs was far smaller, about $8.2 billion, most of which went to just a few candidates, such as monoclonal antibodies. Studies of other drugs were poorly organized.

“The result was that many promising drugs that could stop the disease early, called antivirals, were neglected. Their trials have stalled, either because researchers couldn’t find enough funding or enough patients to participate.”

At the same time the article was a hit job against hydroxychloroquine in particular. It stated that it does not work, in hospitals at least. The author and many researchers seem to be blind to the successful trials of other antiviral drugs, which when used early in the disease development, produced incredible successes.

The China virus is one of many coronaviruses. This one seems to have been engineered in a lab.

As far back as March 2020, Children’s Health Defense was well aware of the direction the US federal agencies were headed. This prompted them to asked these questions “How should America respond to the coronavirus pandemic? With therapeutic drugs or a vaccine?”

Children’s Health Defense answered the question with the following short video posted on YouTube: Dr. Fauci and COVID-19 Priorities: Therapeutics Now or Vaccines Later? Please watch it!

The answer is obvious isn’t it? Money drives most men. They put profits before people.

Thankfully there are a few doctors who put their patients first. For examples see:

Dr Simone Gold: The Truth about COVID19 and the Experimental Vaccines

Viruses: Millions could have been saved

Not just profits

I’d say there is another reason for the lack of therapies. Without effective treatments they can get FDA approval for dangerous experimental injections. And avoid any liability.

People crazed with fear over dying from a virus with a 99.99% survival rate, for those under 65 years old, seem to be willing to inject anything into their bodies. Even unapproved experimental agents.

What don’t they believe in satanic influence in the world? Don’t you think those cruel evil rulers, who live in the shadows, controlling the populations of many nations, are under the control of Satan and his minions?

Sure they are. And their goal is global domination and as part of that they want to eliminate/kill 95% of us. See Shadow Gate. Who are they?

Bill Gates, Co-Chair the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation shows a vaccine during the press conference. UN Photo / Jean-Marc FerrŽ

It seems a Peruvian court has answered that question. According to SGT Report

Three of the evilest entities on the planet were charged in a Peruvian court the other day of conspiring to create the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) for world domination.

Bill Gates [who funded the Moderna vaccine development], George Soros, and several members of the Rockefeller family were deemed responsible for the advent and spread of the Chinese virus, which has killed tens of thousands of small businesses and forever changed the world for the worst.

The Chicha and Pisco Criminal Appeals Chamber decided that the ever-dreaded Chinese germs were the product of “criminal elite around the world” – mostly multi-billionaires with global depopulation on their minds.

These defendants had tried to appeal, but Judges Tito Gallego, Luis Legia, and Tony Changarei issued a delay, justifying it due to the “unpredictable” nature of the “pandemic.”

It was only predictable for ordinary people, however, as the alleged creators of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “who have been involved in it and continue to manage it with particular secrecy in their environment” are entirely unaffected.

In fact, Bill Gates has never once been seen wearing a face mask, nor is he willing to take the vaccines he is now pushing everyone else to get for their “safety” and “protection” against the WuFlu.

“No world government, individuals or legal entities, nor the defense of the accused can claim that this pandemic has the quality of ‘foresight,’ except for the creators of the new world order, such as Bill Gates, Soros, Rockefeller, etc.,” the magistrates wrote in their resolution, which was posted to the LP Law portal.

Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine studies

For those denying the effectiveness of early treatment, this is your legacy:

1,341,968

unnecessary deaths

(2pm Perth time, 4 Feb 2021)

Based on adoption and early outpatient use of the current best treatment when it was known to be effective from multiple studies at p = 0.01 (ivermectin from Sep 30, 2020, and HCQ from May 19, 2020), and adjusting for the estimated fraction of the world that adopted these treatments. The total number of COVID-19 deaths is 2,279,220.

There have been 36 controlled studies of ivermectin for COVID-19, authored by 255 scientists, with 10,423 patients. Meta analysis shows a 82% improvement for early treatment, relative risk 0.18 [0.10-0.34].

There have been 197 controlled studies of HCQ for COVID-19, authored by 3,108 scientists, with 167,522 patients. Meta analysis shows a 66% improvement for early treatment, relative risk 0.34 [0.27-0.44] (HCQ is not effective when used too late). Many other early treatments are effective, for example vitamin D and Bamlanivimab (LY-CoV555). Using multiple treatments, especially with different mechanisms of action, is likely to further reduce deaths.

See also: Exposed: Operation Warp Speed

By John Gideon Hartnett

Dr John G. Hartnett is an Australian physicist and cosmologist, and a Christian with a biblical creationist worldview. He received a B.Sc. (Hons) and Ph.D. (with distinction) in Physics from The University of Western Australia, W.A., Australia. He was an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Outstanding Researcher Award (DORA) fellow at the University of Adelaide, with rank of Associate Professor. Now he is retired. He has published more than 200 papers in scientific journals, book chapters and conference proceedings.

2 replies on “Why is there little research on coronavirus therapies?”

People like Craig Kelly have attempted to expose the demonisation of cheap viral therapy drugs. It is frustrating that regardless of medical people who have spoken in their support of viral drugs, that government medical authorities have condemned their use. John’s explanation of evil at work is a reasonable explanation.

Like

John,

I came across this report of Australian researchers finding the use of Ivermectin being used to treat coronavirus patients. You may have come across this as well. Australian Researchers Tout New ‘Wonder Drug’ As a Potential Cure for Coronavirus Patients. OAN News, February 1, 2021.
Ivermectin has sometimes been used in place of Hydroxychloroquine – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xklE0jTgaw%5D

You can find this as article #130 on my web page here: https://www.heinzlycklama.com/hydroxychloroquine/

Like

Comments are closed.