Lord Fauci explains that the COVID vaxxines are really waning in efficacy over time. Very quickly they have become totally ineffective against the very virus they were meant to protect against. But of course we all know the story here: they are utterly useless as they have never stopped infection nor transmission. Now it seems they do nothing to help at all. All this is shown in the following video to the tune of the The Hall of the Mountain King. Apologies to Edvard Grieg.
Available on my Bitchute channel.
Comments welcome below.
Join me on Telegram.org: @GideonHartnett https://t.me/gideonhartnett
If you want to be notified by email each time I add a new post click the “Email” button below and add your email address.
Bible Science Forum 
15 responses to “The Decay of efficacy of the COVID Shots”
“Lord Fauci explains that the COVID vaxxines are really waning in efficacy over time.”
Give me a break. The only thing they were ever effective at was injuring or killing. They were never effective at protecting against COVID-19 for even a second.
LikeLike
Of course, you know I wrote that as satire!
LikeLike
Of course. My response was directed at his statement. I know you don’t buy that either.
LikeLike
Stats for my country Sweden, since 1 July 2021, shows that 42,509/67,863 = 63% of cases are among unvaccinated. Moreover, 211/277 = 76% of patients in intensive care with Covid-19 are unvaccinated. 71/252 = 28 % cases of deaths with Covid-19 are among unvaccinated, which they say is due to a higher vaccination rate among the elderly. Looks to me that vaccination does reduce Covid-19 cases and the need for intensive care. I’m sure this is true in Australia and globally too. How do you explain such figures (you don’t know Swedish, but what about other countries)?
source (Table 1a and 1b, in Swedish): https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/folkhalsorapportering-statistik/statistikdatabaser-och-visualisering/vaccinationsstatistik/statistik-for-vaccination-mot-covid-19/uppfoljning-av-vaccination/forekomst-av-covid-19-efter-vaccination/
LikeLike
What is the definition of “unvaccinated”? We have seen that many countries now define “unvaccinated” as anyone who is within 2 weeks of a shot, which could be first shot, second shot or even their first booster. From the stats in Israel with > 90% of adults vaxxed, 90% of hospitalisations are amongst the vaxxed and 10% from unvaxxed. This is the same percentages as in the population at large, which says that the vaxxines do nothing at all. They are useless, at least the Pfizer shot is as that is what is used in Israel.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s not nonsense John. There are clear medical definitions of “vaccinated” and “immunised”. They might be be used somewhat confusingly outside, but the medical world knows how to define their terms pretty precisely.
And yes, if you get to a 100% vaccination rate in a country, 100% of the cases are among the vaccinated. Basic statistics. If you are not even willing to see that, and are unable to make sound statistical arguments, you’re not presenting this issue in good faith.
LikeLike
I disagree. Saying 80% of cases in hospital are “not fully vaccinated” is disingenuous. That is what Australian press now reports. It is not me saying that. And redefining “unvaccinated” as a person being within 2 weeks of a shot whether it is the first, second, third or whatever is deception. Revelation 18:23 “by deception they deceived the nations with their pharmakia (sorcery)”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You may not know this but the CDC redefied the terms for vaccinated and immunization on September 1st. That alone should tell you how deceitful they are.
LikeLike
It is not stated how vaccinated is defined, neither was I able to find it by googling.
LikeLike
Just read this article:
https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/cdc-recently-changed-definition-vaccine-vaccination-fascinating
LikeLike
The CDC and other health organizations are very deceptive in how they classify people and how they report deaths and injuries and so forth. They control the narrative so you can’t very well trust that narrative.
LikeLike
No they are not. If you need the entire world to be in a conspiracy theory in order for your conspiracy theory to work, you need to seek help. Your brain isn’t working. No, gazillions of health professionals are not lying or part of some big conspiracy.
Yes, there is a dishonesty how they classify a Covid-19 death from deaths due to vaccination, yes they make mistakes when counting Covid-19 deaths, but we now that because that information is out there.
And no, they’re not deliberately lying to you, while knowing the truth. That’s insane even to think.
LikeLike
Yes, they are. The evidence for their dishonesty is overwhelming. There is a lawsuit right now over the CDC manipulating statistics, which is deliberate lying.
There are plenty of doctors, nurses, and whistleblowers exposing their lies. If you choose the believe the billion dollar industry that has proven to be corrupt for decades over citizens who are seeing what is happening firsthand then that’s your choice. Willfully ignorant.
LikeLike
Check this: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/cdc-director-us-may-update-definition-full-vaccination-covid-19-2021-10-22/
They admit they may change the definition of “fully vaccinated”. I quote from the article:
They’ll reclassify it so 2 shots are not enough. The 1st booster is needed. Then the 4th and the 5th ad nauseam.
LikeLike
We’ll soon see who is lying to whom. I am not a “conspiracy theorist”. That term was invented by the deep state to slur those who seek truth and expose their dark secrets. Besides the cabal tell us what they plan to do and they are doing it now. In Australia they will soon prevent any unvaxxed from entering shops to buy food. They also plan to freeze ABNs so people can’t do business and TFNs so people cannot earn a wage. https://realnewsaustralia.com/2021/10/21/leak-aus-government-plans-to-freeze-abn-or-tfn-of-the-unvaccinated/
The next step will be the mark of the beast.
LikeLike