Rhonda Thomas exposes a very sick educational project to Alex Newman of the New American.
A government school in Georgia has been exposed forcing high-school students to develop a business plan for a company that would tackle world hunger by making babies into food, sparking outrage across the state and beyond. In this interview on Conversations That Matter with Alex Newman, Truth in Education leader Rhonda Thomas breaks down the sick “exercise” and even shows some of the graphics and photos. Spread the word!
PFIZER LEAKS: Whistleblower goes on record, and reveals internal emails from Chief Scientific Officer & Senior Director of Worldwide Research Discussing COVID Vaccine. That Pfizer executive wrote:
‘We Want to Avoid Having the Information on the Fetal Cells Floating Out There’
Pfizer is deliberately hiding the fact that they are using aborted fetal tissue in order to prevent religious exemptions both from governments and the people. They don’t want Christians, well any one with a moral compass, to learn this horrific fact. They are making way too much money to tell the truth!
This is just more evidence of the new barbarism we are now living under.
Never before in human history has there been such a coordinated campaign to convince humans to dishonor the design of their bodies. Since the onset of the Sexual Revolution in the 1960s, there has been a concerted effort to thwart the normal functioning of biology. It seems no coincidence that the era of “free love” was birthed around the same time that hormonal contraceptives were introduced, promising predictable prevention of unwanted births.
Hippies were told to “enjoy” free love, to throw off the marital inhibitions of their parents. But to do so, to copulate without constraint, necessarily resulted in certain consequences: did anyone really want to bring a child into the world with that guy or gal they just met yesterday? Alas! What to do? For some, the “pill” became the fuel for the engine of sexual promiscuity, promising sexual pleasure unhinged from sexual responsibilities, an unprecedented upheaval in the ordering of human relations.
The advent of hormonal contraception was initially presented as a means for married couples to space the birth of their children. But in short order, laws prohibiting the sale of such contraceptive medication to the unmarried were ruled “unconstitutional”. Over time, sex outside the bounds of marriage became more and more common, as sex came to be seen merely as a recreational activity, that deserved, in an enlightened world, to be detached from cumbersome, lifelong commitments.
I was a boy scout as a young boy. Well, I was horrified when I read this article from Steemit. I repost it below.
This is what we are dealing with in the leaders of government today. Listen to Senator Heffernan’s speech to the Australia parliament. So many of the ruling elite are compromised by their pedophilia. They are now far more organised that Baden-Powell ever was. They are now organised on an industrial scale.
Yet again I have been poleaxed by a slice of history I had no intention of looking into. I was intending to look through the archives to help with the concluding part of my ‘KIDS=PROFIT’ series, this one was to be on the subject of Judges in the family courts.
But as always, when typing generalised search queries, you get a lot of unrelated results. I would say 5% of the whole page has what I am looking for and the rest is just there to slow me down. I do however, maintain a peripheral gaze on the chaff around my targets. Many times, I have discovered information so interesting that it literally stops the press. Well fortunately for you and I, this is one of those discoveries and it started with this…
It was the important looking names that led me to believe that there may be a few good quotes inside. At this point I had no idea who these guys were and was still looking for evidence against the courts and judges. A little historical evidence is always good to back up claims of systemic abuse so the archived study looked a promising find, and boy was it! Just not in the way I was expecting. As I read the first few passages, to gain some kind of understanding of who these guys were, I knew I had struck gold…
This is my response to the article published January 28, 2021, by Fr. Matthew Schneider, titled “If Any Drug Tested on HEK-293 Is Immoral, Goodbye Modern Medicine”. Obviously from a catholic perspective. His general thesis is captured in what he wrote:
Personally I take exception with the affirmation that vaccines help you and others, but for this discussion I’ll leave it at that.
The author lists many drugs which he says have been tested using the HEK-293 embryonic cell line, which is the one he focused. I have not checked the validity of his claims, but if true, I say no medication should be used by a true believer in the Lord if it was developed with or tested on embryonic cells. Some investigation might be needed to find ethical alternatives. There are many in the natural (alternative) medical world. For example, I no longer use any pain medications at all. Not even paracetamol. I have found good alternatives that are non-toxic chemicals.
No cooperation with evil
This seems to be a discussion of whether it amounts to remote or proximate cooperation with evil. The author argues that because the abortion on which the cell lines were established occurred a long time ago thus the cooperation with evil is remote. It’s like saying that the level of sin has now been diluted down to a miniscule level so you are ok to take advantage of what comes of it. It is no longer sinful.
I remember some years ago when I read about Lipton testing their tea with fetal cells. From that moment on I chose never to drinking that brand again. But many foods, vaccines and other products have been tested with or developed with human fetal cells. See the list here. Don’t consume any processed foods and you’ll avoid those companies’ products.
Unborn fetus in formalin solution, medical research
Someone asked me about my current relationship with Creation Ministries International (CMI) because he no longer saw any new articles written by me appearing on their platform (creation.com).
I explained that I no longer contribute articles or work with them. This situation came about through the organisation’s stance on fetal cells used in vaccines.
Dr John Gideon Hartnett 11 March 2021
For a long time I felt that the leadership had an unacceptable element of biased editorial control. CMI says that they promote a biblical creation (not evolution) message and provide the opportunity for peer-review science publications that are free of the secular bias against such writings. But they have adopted certain corporate positions, which seems to fly in the face of free debate even within the biblical creation discussion space.
Here I highlight aspects of the murderous abortion industry in the following two short videos. They expose the total lack of morals in the so-called modern society. In my view, God cannot make the fires of Hell hot enough for those involved.
Abortion is murder. How come it is called a termination and then they deny that the product of that abortion was a human being? Is it because people’s hearts have become calloused and harden so that they cannot feel anymore?
Stanley Plotkin Under Oath: Fetal Tissue in Vaccines, Studies on Orphans and Children
11 January 2018: Attorney Aaron Siri destroys the world’s top vaccinologist, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, in a deposition in which, Dr. Plotkin describes how he and his colleagues harvested organs, including pituitary glands, hearts, eyes, kidneys, tongues, etc. from hundreds of fully formed aborted fetuses (at least 3 months old) for use in making their vaccines.
How can you tell we are in a war of good verses evil? Answer: just look at what is being censored. Just look at the injustice of silencing those who tell the truth.
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that count darkness as light, and light as darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Isaiah 5:20
It is the work of Satan to call black white and white black, to call evil good and good evil. This is what the scriptures warn of when people justify themselves by their own standards. When they impose unrighteous standards in other. A man is never a woman. There are only two genders/sexes and not 57 or more. Basic science tells us that. The Bible tells us that. We are made in the image of God.
But the Lord says (Isaiah 5:24) the evil ones who do this shall perish “because they have cast away the law of the Lord of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel“.
Abortion, in my opinion, is the worse crime on earth today. I am surprised how little protest against the horrors of abortion there is, especially amongst Christians. With more than 100,000 abortions each year in Australia and millions in the US where is the outrage? Instead, it is called women’s health. Well, that is far from anything to do with health.
The method they can use, to prevent the baby taking a breathe of air, is to deliver the baby breach, so that the head is delivered last. Then they take a sharp instrument and sever the baby’s spine killing it.
But sometimes babies survive this and are born alive. So the doctors/nurses leave it to die alone on some cold metal tray, not rending any assistance to keep the child alive.
What has become of humanity?
The following is an article from 2019 that the lamestream media and Snopes tried to claim was mostly false. But it is true alright.
Bozell & Graham Column: Abortion Horrors Buried by the Press
by Brent Bozell and Tim Graham September 24th, 2019
Part 1 of my review of the book: “The Big Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning and the Universe Itself,” by Sean M. Carroll a theoretical physicist at the California Institute of Technology, and an outspoken atheist (not to be confused with Sean B. Carroll, an evolutionary biologist). The book was the winner of the 2013 Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books.
Front cover of book. Published by Oneworld Publications, London, 2016, 470 pages.
On the inside book cover these questions are written:
Where are we? Who are we? Do our beliefs, hopes and dreams mean anything out there in the void? Can human purpose and meaning ever fit into a scientific worldview?
Carroll’s message in this book is that there is no ultimate purpose, we are only the product of matter and material forces, there is no meaning to life, there is no afterlife and meaning and purpose do not fit into any scientific worldview. But the author tries to dress it up saying that it’s what you put into your life that counts. Beauty is found in the observer. But he cannot escape his own bondage because his worldview ultimately does not allow for intrinsic meaning or purpose. He is just dead in the end.
There is nothing new in this book but a lot of atheistic philosophy stemming from Enlightenment philosopher David Hume. The author uses circular reasoning and begging the question. By assuming there is no Creator because He is not needed in the universe, to cause it or operate within it, and by assuming everything in the past evolution of the universe and life in it is explained by man’s current knowledge (Darwinian evolution by mutation and natural selection) then everything can be explained how it came to be. The Universe needs no reason to exist. It simply is. Life needs no reason, it simply is. There was nothing before time began in the big bang so no question can be asked what was before? There is no First Cause because either the universe came into the existence with the beginning of time itself, or, time is fundamental and always existed so from it and the laws of physics the universe spontaneously arose from some quantum fluctuation. Now that we are smarter we have come to understand this true fact.
He talks of methodological empiricism as the correct way to learn the truth about the universe but he offers no direct empirical evidence for the origin of the universe in a big bang, or for the initial alleged low entropy state it started in, or for the spontaneous origin of life by random chance, or for the alleged Darwinian evolution of living organisms by natural selection over eons of history. We are essentially asked to just believe these as given facts as much as the author seems to. Only he offers up stories to justify his beliefs. As a book alleged to give the Big Picture of the Universe and all life in it, it fails on the very premise the author sets out to use—direct observation of the world to discover the truth.
.png)
