Categories
Chemistry COVID pandemic Science

No Proof of SARS-CoV-2 virus or that PCR test is accurate

The folks at Reignite Democracy Australia asked the Australian government Health department two questions under the Freedom of Information Act.

They asked for documents that provide factual scientific evidence for the existence of the China coronavirus (COVID19 SARS-CoV-2) from it being isolated from a symptomatic patient.

They asked for documents that provide factual scientific evidence beyond any reasonable doubt that the PCR test used in Australia 100% positively identifies the China coronavirus (COVID19 SARS-CoV-2) and not any other coronavirus.

They got their response. No such documents exist!

Categories
COVID satan Science vaccines

PCR test swabs may contain “star-shaped microdevices” that secretly vaccinate the “vaccine hesitant”

Back in November, Johns Hopkins University (JHU) published a study that suggests Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) testing swabs may be laced with “tiny, star-shaped microdevices” capable of delivering vaccines to people without their knowledge or consent.

Because more than half of America is “vaccine hesitant,” meaning most people want nothing to do with Chinese virus jabs, “science” apparently came up with a hidden injection technology to secretly vaccinate people through the nasal or anal PCR test swabs that are jammed into their orifices.

Patrick Smith from JHU wrote in an article about the study that these tiny, star-shaped microdevices were “[i]nspired by a parasitic worm that digs its sharp teeth into its host’s intestines.” Sounds fun, eh?

“David Gracias, a professor in the Whiting School of Engineering, and gastroenterologist Florin M. Selaru, director of the Johns Hopkins Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, led a team of researchers and biomedical engineers that designed and tested shape-changing microdevices that mimic the way the parasitic hookworm affixes itself to an organism’s intestines,” Smith wrote.

Categories
COVID New World Order Politics vaccines

Why is there little research on coronavirus therapies?

According to the dictionary the meaning of the word ‘therapy’ is the treatment of disease or disorders, as by some remedial, rehabilitative, or curative process. Why then are doctors who promote re-purposed off-label drugs with which they have achieved incredible success curing patients who have contracted the COVID-19 disease from the China virus? Such drugs as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have been demonised and in some cases declared dangerous.

On Jan. 30 , 2021, the New York Times published an article, “How the Search for COVID-19 treatments Faltered While Vaccines Sped Ahead.” The article bemoaned the fact that “nearly a year into the coronavirus pandemic, as thousands of patients are dying every day in the United States and widespread vaccination is still months away, doctors have precious few drugs to fight the virus.”

According to the NY Times:

“The government poured $18.5 billion into vaccines, a strategy that resulted in at least five effective products at record-shattering speed. But its investment in drugs was far smaller, about $8.2 billion, most of which went to just a few candidates, such as monoclonal antibodies. Studies of other drugs were poorly organized.

“The result was that many promising drugs that could stop the disease early, called antivirals, were neglected. Their trials have stalled, either because researchers couldn’t find enough funding or enough patients to participate.”

Categories
Chemistry COVID pandemic Science

New study concludes beyond a reasonable doubt the China virus escaped from a laboratory

A rigorous Bayesian analysis, by eminent scientist Dr Steven Quay, concludes that, with a 99.8% probability, the China virus originated in a laboratory. It did not jump from some other animal in what is termed zoonosis.

I remember that US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that is came from the lab of the Wuhan Institute of Virology. It sure looks like that is correct. That means it was man-made and not some accidental jumping of the virus from some horseshoe bats that people ate in Wuhan.

What follows is the scientists own press release summary of his findings.

PRESS RELEASE: 29 January 2021

SEATTLE, Jan 29, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — A paper was published today by Dr. Steven Quay, M.D., PhD., CEO of Atossa Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: ATOS), entitled, “A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived.” The 193-page paper can be downloaded from  Zenodo, a general-purpose open-access repository operated by CERN, here:  https://zenodo.org/record/4477081# . A short ‘explainer’ video about the paper is here: https://youtu.be/ATUtjvgT8iI

Categories
Chemistry COVID vaccines

Viruses: Millions could have been saved

The discovery that the old off-label drugs Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin are extremely effective against all viral infections is probably one of the major discoveries of this century. These are drugs are ionosphores.  Many ionophores are lipid-soluble chemicals that transport ions across the cell membrane. In the case of the China virus they open the cells and allow agents like Zinc to enter and kill the replication of the viruses. This was reported by Dr Vladimir Zelenko of New York who has successfully treated more than a thousand patients sick with the China virus of which nearly to all of them have recovered.

Dr Vladimir Zelenko

Zelenko stated:

“My own treatment of patients within high-risk groups, along with independent research, have shown that hospitalizations can be reduced by 84% by using protocols that involve both HCQ and Zinc,”

“You can say that the failure of the medical and political community to adopt demonstrated effective treatment techniques has led to the unnecessary death of approximately 250,000 people.” [in the USA]

Categories
COVID Science vaccines

COVID ‘vaccines’ are useless in stopping the virus

Vaccine manufacturer Merck has said its vaccines (which are now scrapped) were less effective than catching the China virus and naturally developing antibodies against the disease. In related news, German scientists have claimed that the UK Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine is less than 8% effective in over 65s. This significant in Australia because the government has heavily invested in the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine.

In addition to that, none of the vaccines under development (and none have yet been approved) were ever studied to see if they stop the transmission of the disease. Pfizer admitted that they did not test human subjects to see if those vaccinated could get and spread the infection. Thus the ‘vaccines’ cannot be used by governments around the world in their messaging as the pathway to ease the draconian lockdowns. So why even bother?

We also know that Pfizer and Moderna experimental injections are unapproved. They are not technically vaccines but some sort of gene therapy devices, and they have already caused many deaths and other adverse reactions.

It has now been discovered that the most likely scenario is that China released the Wuhan virus or it accidentally escaped the Wuhan lab. Either way the CCP took advantage of this to attack the West.