Categories
Decay of society evolution Science vaccines

Human fetal DNA in vaccines is unsafe

On June 15th, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. interviewed the founder and president of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, Dr Theresa Deisher, on the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines. Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute is a non profit research organisation devoted to find ethical moral alternatives to the human fetal tissues used in vaccine and medicine production.

Dr Theresa Deisher

Human fetal cell line products

On her website Dr. Deisher discusses the presence of human fetal products in our food and vaccines and her mission to create affordable alternatives.

To date, 24 vaccines (10 of these are used in the US) contain components that are produced using human fetal cell lines (the cell lines MRC-5 and WI-38). There are currently 3 FDA approved recombinant drugs with up to 85 coming soon, and specialty cosmetic anti-aging creams also produced using human fetal cell lines or human fetal cell proteins.

In the interview Mr. Kennedy and Dr. Deisher covered a wide range of topics including which vaccines contain human fetal DNA, what the existing research tells us in terms of health risks with vaccines, and what alternatives might be used in place of human DNA in vaccines.

Categories
Science

The Denial of Adverse Event Risk Following Immunization and the Loss of Informed Consent – A Perspective

Here I link to a very long article that is worth your time reading. It is well researched with many supporting published scientific papers supporting the claims. The following was written by K. Paul Stoller, MD, FACHM, Fellow American College of Hyperbaric Medicine.

“Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information…The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.” 

2005 UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights1

Introduction

Vaccines are public health measures that are not evidence-based as portrayed by authorities such as the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).  For example, despite political propaganda to the contrary, the scientific reality is vaccines are not subjected to the same kind of clinical trials as other drugs are. They are classified not as drugs but as biologics, which  allows them to be routinely approved and mandated with little to no evidence of efficacy or safety while at the same time actual evidence of vaccine harm is systematically ignored by vaccine manufacturers and authorities who work together under multiple unethical conflicts of interest. Consequently, vaccines are a grave threat to public health and medical ethics. Furthermore, informed consent in vaccination is deeply endangered today both in medical practice and as an ethical principle in society.  Natural immunity is similarly endangered today due to modern vaccination policy.  Promoting categorically unsafe vaccines and discouraging the responsible development of natural immunity has become state-sponsored policy where the policy itself is what gets protected – not the public.

In the US, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated their policy on this issue clearly, “any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.” This was recorded in the Federal Register (vol 49, No. 107) and made specifically about the polio vaccine.

The heart of informed consent involves
comparing relative risks, based on actual data.

Read the whole article here https://www.townsendletter.com/article/441-loss-of-informed-consent-adverse-event-immunization/