Never before in human history has there been such a coordinated campaign to convince humans to dishonor the design of their bodies. Since the onset of the Sexual Revolution in the 1960s, there has been a concerted effort to thwart the normal functioning of biology. It seems no coincidence that the era of “free love” was birthed around the same time that hormonal contraceptives were introduced, promising predictable prevention of unwanted births.
Hippies were told to “enjoy” free love, to throw off the marital inhibitions of their parents. But to do so, to copulate without constraint, necessarily resulted in certain consequences: did anyone really want to bring a child into the world with that guy or gal they just met yesterday? Alas! What to do? For some, the “pill” became the fuel for the engine of sexual promiscuity, promising sexual pleasure unhinged from sexual responsibilities, an unprecedented upheaval in the ordering of human relations.
The advent of hormonal contraception was initially presented as a means for married couples to space the birth of their children. But in short order, laws prohibiting the sale of such contraceptive medication to the unmarried were ruled “unconstitutional”. Over time, sex outside the bounds of marriage became more and more common, as sex came to be seen merely as a recreational activity, that deserved, in an enlightened world, to be detached from cumbersome, lifelong commitments.
Here I highlight aspects of the murderous abortion industry in the following two short videos. They expose the total lack of morals in the so-called modern society. In my view, God cannot make the fires of Hell hot enough for those involved.
Abortion is murder. How come it is called a termination and then they deny that the product of that abortion was a human being? Is it because people’s hearts have become calloused and harden so that they cannot feel anymore?
Stanley Plotkin Under Oath: Fetal Tissue in Vaccines, Studies on Orphans and Children
11 January 2018: Attorney Aaron Siri destroys the world’s top vaccinologist, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, in a deposition in which, Dr. Plotkin describes how he and his colleagues harvested organs, including pituitary glands, hearts, eyes, kidneys, tongues, etc. from hundreds of fully formed aborted fetuses (at least 3 months old) for use in making their vaccines.
Sometimes I meet people who say that President Donald J. Trump never did anything good while in office. But that is totally false. One of the most serious global issues today is human trafficking, which includes many many thousands of children trafficked for sex and worse. Donald Trump did a lot to halt this trade, more than any other president before him. Could it be God used him to save these children?
Watch this video “Trump’s war on human trafficking” presented by Liz Crokin.
Possibly there are only a few worst crimes than this. One is abuse of children, which are murdered in the thousands in satanic rituals. Another is the corporate kidnapping (largely from foster care) and imprisoning children to harvest their blood while they are tortured for the drug adenochrome.
Abortion, in my opinion, is the worse crime on earth today. I am surprised how little protest against the horrors of abortion there is, especially amongst Christians. With more than 100,000 abortions each year in Australia and millions in the US where is the outrage? Instead, it is called women’s health. Well, that is far from anything to do with health.
The method they can use, to prevent the baby taking a breathe of air, is to deliver the baby breach, so that the head is delivered last. Then they take a sharp instrument and sever the baby’s spine killing it.
But sometimes babies survive this and are born alive. So the doctors/nurses leave it to die alone on some cold metal tray, not rending any assistance to keep the child alive.
What has become of humanity?
The following is an article from 2019 that the lamestream media and Snopes tried to claim was mostly false. But it is true alright.
Bozell & Graham Column: Abortion Horrors Buried by the Press
by Brent Bozell and Tim Graham September 24th, 2019
The cells from aborted healthy babies have been used in the development of vaccines and medicines for about 80 years. The argument has been made that since the cell lines are significantly unrelated to the act of the abortion of the baby it is morally justifiable for a Christian to receive vaccines that used such cells in their development and manufacture.
However it is argued that it would be morally wrong if the babies were aborted for the express purpose of using their parts to develop the vaccines and other medicines. I agree. But even if these babies weren’t aborted for the purpose of using their body parts, it would still be morally wrong to use them to develop vaccines and other medicines. But as it stands, the aforementioned argument relies on the notion that the cell lines used are so old, coming from aborted babies back in the 1960s, that there is now little connection to them.
Jonathan Sarfati of CMI wrote in an online letter defending their use:1
“No new embryos are being generated for the purpose of culturing vaccines (this is immoral). The vaccine makers had nothing to do with the abortions.”
Using aborted babies 50 days or 50 years after being killed does not make it morally right. Additional time cannot make something morally right. And whether the researchers had anything to do with the abortions is irrelevant to the argument whether it is morally right to use aborted baby parts. Furthermore is that premise really true in vaccine and other medical research today?
As you may already know aborted human fetal cells are used to culture active agents in preparation of many vaccines. Here is a table of various vaccines which used fetal cells and with them a list shown of some ethical alternatives that did not use aborted baby products.
Let’s put aside the whole issue of whether you are pro-vax or anti-vax. I want to ask the following question and I would like your feedback in the Comments section please. Let me know which way you would lean on this.
Is it morally equivalent to say that accepting a vaccine based on an aborted fetal cell line is the same as accepting a transplant organ from a murdered person?
According to an online Catholic publication the Australian charity “White Ribbon” supports late-term abortion. Their claim is supported by White Ribbon’s own position statement on abortion.
That is quite ironic considering that about half of all aborted babies are female, and White Ribbon advocates ending violence against women. Of course the latter is a laudable goal but it is inconsistent with killing babies in the womb, don’t you think?
The following is excerpted from the Catholic Leader:
WHITE Ribbon Australia, known as the “Say no to violence against women” organisation is under scrutiny for supporting late-term abortion.
White Ribbon is named alongside organisations supporting candidates in the current Queensland election who have made a “pro-choice” pledge to “vote to remove abortion from the criminal code”.
Ahead of White Ribbon Day on November 25, South Australian Christian high school teacher Trevor Grace and his wife Robyn, who runs Pregnancy Help SA, are leading a national campaign to inform organisations of the charity’s pro-abortion stance.
“Few people are aware that White Ribbon supports and endorses full-term abortion,” Mr Grace, a long-standing political activist, said.
He has contacted churches and Christian schools alerting them of White Ribbon Australia’s position statement on women’s reproductive rights which states that the charity believes: “Denying a woman access to contraception and abortion is a denial of basic rights to health care”.
“It is a woman’s right to choose if and when she gets pregnant. It is a woman’s right to seek an abortion,” the White Ribbon statement says.
Yet Australia is one of the wealthiest nations in the world. The Australian charity White Ribbon Australia claims to work to prevent violence against females but aren’t half of all unborn babies females?
Scripture tells us:
“Also in your skirts is found the blood of the souls of the poor innocents…” (Jeremiah 2:34)
When a national government stands by and either condones this or ignores the plight of the innocent then that nation will eventually fall. This is what happened to the Roman Empire. That culture developed to cast off their unwanted children (particularly girls) allowing them to perish on the city walls by leaving them to the beasts and the environment. They even developed abortion techniques by chemical means. Nowadays the same practices are rampant in the western World. In regards to what would seem to be the practice of protecting women and girls against violence it now seems the very charity that claims to do so also supports the legalisation of killing babies in the womb.
Chapter 5 of the book “When Jesus Returns —what then?” by Jim Gibson. I have edited the text only where necessary, changed underlining to bold text and used the KJVER Bible version.
“But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, And knew [understood] not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.” (Matthew 24:37-39)
Here, Jesus is stating that life will go on as normal until the very moment of his return, just as it did when judgment came upon the ungodly in Noah’s time. The question is asked, “what was the ‘normal’ during the time leading up to the flood?” To find the answer to this question, we must turn to the sixth chapter of Genesis.
“And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and thatevery imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually [all the time]. The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence. And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted its way upon the earth. And God said unto Noah, the end of all flesh is come before Me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.” (Genesis 6:5,11-13)
From these verses, we discover that before the flood “all flesh” was corrupt, that is, decayed, rotten, putrified. Their wickedness had become a stench in the nostrils of God. Since we know from Solomon’s writings, that there is “no new thing under the sun”, then we can probably surmise some of the sins which the antediluvians (before the flood) were guilty. Judging from the account of Sodom and Gomorrah, we could rightfully conclude that many of the antediluvians practiced homosexuality. In conjunction with this particular sexual perversion, they also probably engaged in multiple other forms of sexualsin, including, but not limited to, rape, incest, bestiality, and pedophilia.
In Jeremiah 2:34, we find an obscure phrase alluding to the sin of abortion in which Israel had become guilty of. I call it “obscure” since there is not a consensus as to its interpretation. Many take the word “skirts” in a metaphorical sense, however, I believe it should be taken literally.