COVID pandemic Science vaccines

Resolving “Long-Haul COVID” and Vaccine Toxicity: Neutralizing the Spike Protein

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, June 21, 2021

Commentary by Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD

(OMNS June 21, 2021) Although the mainstream media outlets might have you believe otherwise, the vaccines that continue to be administered for the COVID pandemic are emerging as very substantial sources of morbidity and mortality themselves. While the degree to which these negative outcomes of the COVID vaccines can be debated, there is no question that enough disease and death have already occurred to warrant cessation of the administration of these vaccines until additional, completely scientifically-based research can examine the balance between its now clear-cut side effects versus its potential (and still not yet clearly proven) ability to prevent new COVID infections.

Nevertheless, enough vaccinations have already been administered to warrant concern that a new “pandemic” of illness and death may well be emerging from the side effects that continue to be documented in steadily increasing numbers. The vaccine-induced “culprit” that is now receiving most of the attention and is the focus of much new research is the COVID virus fragment known as the spike protein. Its physiological impact appears to be doing far more harm than good (COVID antibody induction), and its manner of introduction appears to be fueling its ongoing replication with a continuing presence inside the body for an indefinite length of time.

The physical appearance of the COVID virus can been depicted as a central sphere of viral protein surrounded completely by spear-like appendages. Known as spike proteins, they are very analogous to the quills surrounding a porcupine. And just as the porcupine stabs its victim, these spike proteins penetrate into cell membranes throughout the body. After this penetration, protein-dissolving enzymes are activated, the cell membrane breaks down, the viral sphere enters the cytoplasm through this membrane breach, and the metabolism of the cell is subsequently “hijacked” to manufacture more viral particles. These spike proteins are the focus of a great deal of ongoing research examining vaccine side effects (Belouzard et al., 2012; Shang et al., 2020).

COVID New World Order prophecy vaccines worldview

Illuminati Cards

Recently I posted about the Simpsons cartoon TV show predicting the global coronavirus plandemic. A few days ago a friend sent me the following showing the cards of the Illuminati game. It is amazing how these vehicles of entertainment predict events of 2020/21. Or is it?

Make of this what you will. It certainly reinforces the idea that it was all planned; a plandemic!

Photo by Markus Spiske on

Now you must be thinking I am really donning a tinfoil hat. I would never have believed in any of the so-called “conspiracy theories”. That term was coined, I am told, by the CIA to relegate certain ideas to the realm of fantasy. But many of those ideas may, in fact, turn out to be true. The year 2020 and COVID-1984 has certainly shown us that that is true.

I was always about believing what I could prove with operational science or if subject fell into the realm of historical science I was under no delusion how difficult it is to prove anything.

The Illuminati cards from a card game, discussed in the sequel, were first produced circa 1995. That is worth noting. What the cards contain is significant. Even if you believe that “conspiracy theorists” developed them back then, you would also have to believe that they got a lot right. Hence it is not theory but fact.

My friend wrote saying that he has known about the Illuminati cards for some years but looking at recent history he felt that that they should be examined in the light of global events that have shaken the whole world, particularly the West.

COVID New World Order Politics vaccines

Why is there little research on coronavirus therapies?

According to the dictionary the meaning of the word ‘therapy’ is the treatment of disease or disorders, as by some remedial, rehabilitative, or curative process. Why then are doctors who promote re-purposed off-label drugs with which they have achieved incredible success curing patients who have contracted the COVID-19 disease from the China virus? Such drugs as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have been demonised and in some cases declared dangerous.

On Jan. 30 , 2021, the New York Times published an article, “How the Search for COVID-19 treatments Faltered While Vaccines Sped Ahead.” The article bemoaned the fact that “nearly a year into the coronavirus pandemic, as thousands of patients are dying every day in the United States and widespread vaccination is still months away, doctors have precious few drugs to fight the virus.”

According to the NY Times:

“The government poured $18.5 billion into vaccines, a strategy that resulted in at least five effective products at record-shattering speed. But its investment in drugs was far smaller, about $8.2 billion, most of which went to just a few candidates, such as monoclonal antibodies. Studies of other drugs were poorly organized.

“The result was that many promising drugs that could stop the disease early, called antivirals, were neglected. Their trials have stalled, either because researchers couldn’t find enough funding or enough patients to participate.”

Chemistry COVID vaccines

Viruses: Millions could have been saved

The discovery that the old off-label drugs Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin are extremely effective against all viral infections is probably one of the major discoveries of this century. These are drugs are ionosphores.  Many ionophores are lipid-soluble chemicals that transport ions across the cell membrane. In the case of the China virus they open the cells and allow agents like Zinc to enter and kill the replication of the viruses. This was reported by Dr Vladimir Zelenko of New York who has successfully treated more than a thousand patients sick with the China virus of which nearly to all of them have recovered.

Dr Vladimir Zelenko

Zelenko stated:

“My own treatment of patients within high-risk groups, along with independent research, have shown that hospitalizations can be reduced by 84% by using protocols that involve both HCQ and Zinc,”

“You can say that the failure of the medical and political community to adopt demonstrated effective treatment techniques has led to the unnecessary death of approximately 250,000 people.” [in the USA]