I just finished reading the book “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History” by Suzanne Humphries, MD and Roman Bystrianyk. If you haven’t read it I highly recommend you do so.
The book cover the past two hundred year history of the development of vaccines starting with Dr Jenner’s treatment using cowpox pus scraped from the belly of a cow, to treat patients for smallpox. Past epidemics are analysed in light of the introduction of the so-called vaccinations. The authors include the histories of many common diseases of a few centuries ago, and explain how and when the vaccines were introduced.
The diseases include smallpox, polio, diphtheria, whooping cough (pertussis) and measles. There is no doubt that these diseases were once very serious with very high death rates. But the evidence is that there were factors other than vaccines that primarily were the cause for their diminishing mortality as we approached the 20th century.
I just got through watching this new documentary by Andy J. Wakefield. It is a bombshell that explodes the corruption and perfidy of the relationship that big Pharma has with the US government and the US courts. It is a must see.
I believe that this issue may be one of the biggest issues of our time, not only for Christians, but for all truth seekers. Imagine a system so powerful that those in power can mandate a host of vaccines that all people on the planet are compelled to be injected with regardless of whether they consent or not. This is goes to the very heart of our personal freedom.
The film exposes the truth behind the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which opened the doors for big companies to profit enormously producing vaccines for which they do not need to have any safety standards.
Robert F Kennedy wrote:
For thousands of parents with vaccine-injured children, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) conjures up sadness, betrayal of trust, disappointment and anger. But what does the rest of the public think? Most people don’t even realize the NCVIA exists! They are still under the rosy misconception that vaccines are safe and effective and that our legislators and public health officials would never do anything that would knowingly hurt America’s children.
On June 15th, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. interviewed the founder and president of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, Dr Theresa Deisher, on the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines. Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute is a non profit research organisation devoted to find ethical moral alternatives to the human fetal tissues used in vaccine and medicine production.
Human fetal cell line products
On her website Dr. Deisher discusses the presence of human fetal products in our food and vaccines and her mission to create affordable alternatives.
To date, 24 vaccines (10 of these are used in the US) contain components that are produced using human fetal cell lines (the cell lines MRC-5 and WI-38). There are currently 3 FDA approved recombinant drugs with up to 85 coming soon, and specialty cosmetic anti-aging creams also produced using human fetal cell lines or human fetal cell proteins.
In the interview Mr. Kennedy and Dr. Deisher covered a wide range of topics including which vaccines contain human fetal DNA, what the existing research tells us in terms of health risks with vaccines, and what alternatives might be used in place of human DNA in vaccines.
Robert F Kennedy, Jr. is an environmental lawyer and has made it his life’s mission to save children from the damage that unsafe vaccines are doing to our children. I recommend that you educate yourself on this issue. A place to start is by listen to this series of interviews he gave to Polly Tommey.
Episode 1: Polly Tommey and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. kicked off the new CHD (Childrens Health Defense) Channel on Peeps TV with a lively discussion on a wide range of relevant topics in the health freedom movement. RFK, Jr. shed light on conflict of interest in the development of vaccines, early red flags in the Moderna coronavirus vaccine trials, the new “Vaccine Czar”, pathogenic priming and much more.
In Episode 2 of TRUTH, RFK, Jr. spoke with Polly Tommey about the health epidemics of children, delving even deeper into the specific injuries caused by vaccinations, including those listed on the product inserts. Discussion surrounded the fact that there is essentially no safety testing for vaccines; and, once citizens know this information and do their research, they become steadfast advocates who can’t turn away. The episode closed with a discussion of rights to refuse vaccinations and that parents shouldn’t be bullied!
In Episode 4 of “TRUTH” series, RFK, Jr. spoke with Polly Tommey about the suffering of children and families in Africa and India caused by unsafe vaccines backed, distributed and promoted by Bill Gates. They also discuss the power Dr. Anthony Fauci has in steering the direction of research funded by taxpayers.
In Episode 5 of “TRUTH” series, RFK, Jr. spoke with Polly Tommey about the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, Rachel Carson’s struggle to inform the public about the health risks from exposure to pesticides, and Mr. Kennedy’s long history of holding Monsanto accountable for its dangerous chemicals.
In Episode 7 of “TRUTH” series, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. talks with J.B. Handley, Author of “How to End the Autism Epidemic” about two of his recently CHD published articles “Lockdown Lunacy” and “Lockdown Lunacy 2.0”. The discussion tackles the herd immunity threshold of COVID and many other subjects of the day.
In Episode 8 of “TRUTH” series, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Vaxxed2’s Polly Tommey covered a wide range of topics including Dr. Fauci’s failures and dialed-back vaccine promises, toxic vaccine adjuvants, Bill Gates’ GAVI and loss of individual freedom, annual flu death exaggerations and more.
The cells from aborted healthy babies have been used in the development of vaccines and medicines for about 80 years. The argument has been made that since the cell lines are significantly unrelated to the act of the abortion of the baby it is morally justifiable for a Christian to receive vaccines that used such cells in their development and manufacture.
However it is argued that it would be morally wrong if the babies were aborted for the express purpose of using their parts to develop the vaccines and other medicines. I agree. But even if these babies weren’t aborted for the purpose of using their body parts, it would still be morally wrong to use them to develop vaccines and other medicines. But as it stands, the aforementioned argument relies on the notion that the cell lines used are so old, coming from aborted babies back in the 1960s, that there is now little connection to them.
Jonathan Sarfati of CMI wrote in an online letter defending their use:1
“No new embryos are being generated for the purpose of culturing vaccines (this is immoral). The vaccine makers had nothing to do with the abortions.”
Using aborted babies 50 days or 50 years after being killed does not make it morally right. Additional time cannot make something morally right. And whether the researchers had anything to do with the abortions is irrelevant to the argument whether it is morally right to use aborted baby parts. Furthermore is that premise really true in vaccine and other medical research today?
As you may already know aborted human fetal cells are used to culture active agents in preparation of many vaccines. Here is a table of various vaccines which used fetal cells and with them a list shown of some ethical alternatives that did not use aborted baby products.
Let’s put aside the whole issue of whether you are pro-vax or anti-vax. I want to ask the following question and I would like your feedback in the Comments section please. Let me know which way you would lean on this.
Is it morally equivalent to say that accepting a vaccine based on an aborted fetal cell line is the same as accepting a transplant organ from a murdered person?
Science has become the new religion. Those who dare challenge the dictates of ‘science’ are often declared crackpots, pseudo-scientists or just plain crazy. If you deny or doubt evolution, or anthropogenic global warming (AGW), now called ‘climate change’, or the effectiveness or safety of certain vaccines, or the universal safety of genetically modified foods, as compared with natural breeding and hybridization practices, you are called nasty names. These might include ‘flat-earther’, particularly if you deny Darwinian evolution.1
It has come to a point now that to be called a ‘creationist’ is a big negative, like you are a pseudo-scientist, or follower of astrology, or witch doctors, etc. Such a person is thinking irrationally and cannot be trustedaccording to the new paradigm.
Then there are those who are called some sort of ‘climate change denier’, who must be funded by ‘big oil’, as though they must have a corrupt vested interest or be just plain crazy. As a physicist I have analyzed the global temperature data, spanning the last 100 years, downloaded from the Met Office Hadley Centre.2 I have no vested interest here, but I find that a continued warming trend is not supported by the data. But I remain skeptical. The main problem I see is the limitation of human time scales and the lack of any really robust model that successfully predicts developing trends.3