If there was any time when you had your doubts about all these COVID19 regulations being implemented across the world, please read on. Why are all countries declaring uniform procedures and telling the same story even when it is false. Why does it all seem to be in lockstep?
The narrative is the same regardless of the country. How come? Well, there is a good reason for it. It has all been planned well ahead of time. It has been planned to usher in a new global system of government — a fascist dictatorship by the global elites ruling through the unelected bodies of the United Nations, particularly the WHO.
Moderna is a company Bill Gates is funding to produce a COVID19 vaccine. It uses a technique never used before and takes a piece of DNA or in the case of the Coronavirus SARS-Cov-2, which is alleged to cause the COVID19 disease, it takes a modified piece of the virus RNA and uses your cells to replicate that in the body, changing your cells DNA in the process. Hence the company name MODeRNA.
This technique has never been used before, ever, and they want to use it in a vaccine and inject that into 7 billion people without any long term trials. Who knows what it will do? It may irreversibly change humans at the fundamental level of their DNA so that you become something else – no longer the human – homosapien sapien – that God created in the Garden 6000 years ago, but some transhuman with your DNA owned by a company via the patents they own.
If a person is no longer human then the covenant that God made with the sons and daughters of Adam will no longer apply. This then makes a lot of sense. Such people would effectively become aliens. (I’ve seen sci-fi movies with plots where humans are converted to aliens through genetic manipulation.)
This gives us a clue as to why God, at Christ’s Second Advent, has determined to send all the unrepentant into the Lake of Fire. Could it be similar to the reason He sent a global flood to wipe out all life on Earth 4500 years ago?
Watch this video! Dr. Carrie Madej explains the 3 major components of the Moderna vaccine and the implications.
Over the past 40 odd years I have heard an enormous amount of discussion and read books and literature on the ‘coming mark of the beast’ of the Book of Revelation. I was once a believer in the futurist interpretation of the books of Daniel and Revelation. But sometime back I realised that that interpretation was not correct. (See my studies on Daniel’s Seventy Weeks and in particular on Daniel 9:27 and who ‘he’ is in that verse.)
I now hold to an historical interpretation of scripture. At first I studied what Martin Lloyd-Jones would have classified as Historical: Continuing. However I found that that is very confining, trying to hang a label and only one label on every event through the Book of Revelation. In this blog many of the published studies on Daniel and Revelation use this method.
However, now I am convinced that the correct way to read the book is with the method of Historical: Spiritual. This is the method where we allow the scripture to be living. It is the idea that there are spiritual principles behind the battles and events encountered by Christians through all ages from Christ until the final Judgement, but not that each description in the book of Revelation applies to uniquely only one event. The scriptures belong to all believers through all generations and can speak to them for their time, and even their place.
The cells from aborted healthy babies have been used in the development of vaccines and medicines for about 80 years. The argument has been made that since the cell lines are significantly unrelated to the act of the abortion of the baby it is morally justifiable for a Christian to receive vaccines that used such cells in their development and manufacture.
However it is argued that it would be morally wrong if the babies were aborted for the express purpose of using their parts to develop the vaccines and other medicines. I agree. But even if these babies weren’t aborted for the purpose of using their body parts, it would still be morally wrong to use them to develop vaccines and other medicines. But as it stands, the aforementioned argument relies on the notion that the cell lines used are so old, coming from aborted babies back in the 1960s, that there is now little connection to them.
Jonathan Sarfati of CMI wrote in an online letter defending their use:1
“No new embryos are being generated for the purpose of culturing vaccines (this is immoral). The vaccine makers had nothing to do with the abortions.”
Using aborted babies 50 days or 50 years after being killed does not make it morally right. Additional time cannot make something morally right. And whether the researchers had anything to do with the abortions is irrelevant to the argument whether it is morally right to use aborted baby parts. Furthermore is that premise really true in vaccine and other medical research today?