This 38 minute video is worth watching. The speakers highlight the massive censorship in Canada typical of most of the western world. Any statement or debate that is critical of the current COVID narrative is censored. Even the Canadian College of Physicians and Surgeons Ontaio has warned all doctors not to criticize the fake plandemic and the experimental injections even when they personally witness adverse reactions to the toxic agents.
MP Derek Sloan an MP in Canada’s parliament introduces Dr Byram Bridle, Dr Phillips and others who have spoken out against the tyranny of lockdowns, masks, testing and experimental COVID injections.
(OMNS June 21, 2021) Although the mainstream media outlets might have you believe otherwise, the vaccines that continue to be administered for the COVID pandemic are emerging as very substantial sources of morbidity and mortality themselves. While the degree to which these negative outcomes of the COVID vaccines can be debated, there is no question that enough disease and death have already occurred to warrant cessation of the administration of these vaccines until additional, completely scientifically-based research can examine the balance between its now clear-cut side effects versus its potential (and still not yet clearly proven) ability to prevent new COVID infections.
Nevertheless, enough vaccinations have already been administered to warrant concern that a new “pandemic” of illness and death may well be emerging from the side effects that continue to be documented in steadily increasing numbers. The vaccine-induced “culprit” that is now receiving most of the attention and is the focus of much new research is the COVID virus fragment known as the spike protein. Its physiological impact appears to be doing far more harm than good (COVID antibody induction), and its manner of introduction appears to be fueling its ongoing replication with a continuing presence inside the body for an indefinite length of time.
The physical appearance of the COVID virus can been depicted as a central sphere of viral protein surrounded completely by spear-like appendages. Known as spike proteins, they are very analogous to the quills surrounding a porcupine. And just as the porcupine stabs its victim, these spike proteins penetrate into cell membranes throughout the body. After this penetration, protein-dissolving enzymes are activated, the cell membrane breaks down, the viral sphere enters the cytoplasm through this membrane breach, and the metabolism of the cell is subsequently “hijacked” to manufacture more viral particles. These spike proteins are the focus of a great deal of ongoing research examining vaccine side effects (Belouzard et al., 2012; Shang et al., 2020).
Bret talks to Robert and Steve about the pandemic, treatments, the COVID vaccines and censorship among other things. It is over 3 hours long but it is worth watching for educational purposes. The timestamps below indicate topics.
One point I don’t agree with is when one says that COVID-19 is very serious. Compared to a bad flu it isn’t so serious imo. COVID-19 now has only a Infection Fatality Rate of 0.14% according to the CDC. Seasonal flue varies between 0.1% and 0.3% in a bad year.
All three men are pro-vax and two of them (Dr Malone and Mr Kirsch) have been fully vaxxed with Moderna mRNA experimental shots. They explain why. They are all involved in the medical/virology/biology fields are openly discuss problems with the current mass vaccination agenda, but never naming who is behind it.
Audio (mp3): Why Are We Not Using Ivermectin For Covid? Slides appear below.
I’m Dr. Tess Lawrie, the Director of The Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy Ltd and CEO of EbMCsquared [Bath, UK], a newly established community interest company. I’m very happy to participate in the Truth Over Fear Covid-19 and the Great Reset Summit. I’ve trained as a medical doctor in South Africa, and now work as an independent external research consultant to organizations such as the World Health Organization. My company routinely reviews bodies of evidence and our independent scientific evidence is widely used to support medical recommendations around the world. I have no conflict of interest.
Why are we not using ivermection for Covid?
My introduction to the potential use of ivermectin for Covid was at the end of December, when I watched Dr. Pierre Kory’s appeal to the US State Senate, that he made early on in the month. Curious about whether ivermectin worked, I reviewed the evidence for myself. On the 4th of January this year, I sent an urgent report on ivermection to the UK and World Health Organization, informing them that the scientific evidence on ivermectin showed that ivermectin prevents and treats Covid at all stages of the disease.
Make of this what you will. It certainly reinforces the idea that it was all planned; a plandemic!
Now you must be thinking I am really donning a tinfoil hat. I would never have believed in any of the so-called “conspiracy theories”. That term was coined, I am told, by the CIA to relegate certain ideas to the realm of fantasy. But many of those ideas may, in fact, turn out to be true. The year 2020 and COVID-1984 has certainly shown us that that is true.
I was always about believing what I could prove with operational science or if subject fell into the realm of historical science I was under no delusion how difficult it is to prove anything.
The Illuminati cards from a card game, discussed in the sequel, were first produced circa 1995. That is worth noting. What the cards contain is significant. Even if you believe that “conspiracy theorists” developed them back then, you would also have to believe that they got a lot right. Hence it is not theory but fact.
My friend wrote saying that he has known about the Illuminati cards for some years but looking at recent history he felt that that they should be examined in the light of global events that have shaken the whole world, particularly the West.
Here is a very important interview of Dr Simone Gold by journalist Michelle Malkin #MalkinLive. There is a very strong possibility that young women who have no fertility issues could become infertile through the COVID mRNA experimental agent.
COVID-19 mRNA experimental agent : Topics discussed include infertility, antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) or pathogenic priming, dengue fever vaccine in the Philippines. Fired for using Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Recommends HCQ or Ivermectin. The formation of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLD). Pushing back on medical mandates. See stopmedicaldiscrimination.org Nuremberg code. Informed consent. Who do you trust for true information? Not medical journals who are compromised by Big Pharma. Non-partisan. Lockdowns don’t work. She discusses her legal case involving her presence at the Capitol January 6th as an invited speaker. She said 20 agents from FBI broke down her door to arrest her. Case still pending. She gives the AFLD recommendations on COVID experimental ‘vaccine’. Not a vaccine but experimental agent. Not recommended for most age groups especially under age 50.
According to the dictionary the meaning of the word ‘therapy’ is the treatment of disease or disorders, as by some remedial, rehabilitative, or curative process. Why then are doctors who promote re-purposed off-label drugs with which they have achieved incredible success curing patients who have contracted the COVID-19 disease from the China virus? Such drugs as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have been demonised and in some cases declared dangerous.
On Jan. 30 , 2021, the New York Times published an article, “How the Search for COVID-19 treatments Faltered While Vaccines Sped Ahead.” The article bemoaned the fact that “nearly a year into the coronavirus pandemic, as thousands of patients are dying every day in the United States and widespread vaccination is still months away, doctors have precious few drugs to fight the virus.”
According to the NY Times:
“The government poured $18.5 billion into vaccines, a strategy that resulted in at least five effective products at record-shattering speed. But its investment in drugs was far smaller, about $8.2 billion, most of which went to just a few candidates, such as monoclonal antibodies. Studies of other drugs were poorly organized.
“The result was that many promising drugs that could stop the disease early, called antivirals, were neglected. Their trials have stalled, either because researchers couldn’t find enough funding or enough patients to participate.”