Aliens Bible prophecy Chemistry pandemic vaccines

Moderna vaccine may create transhumans

Moderna is a company Bill Gates is funding to produce a COVID19 vaccine. It uses a technique never used before and takes a piece of DNA or in the case of the Coronavirus SARS-Cov-2, which is alleged to cause the COVID19 disease, it takes a modified piece of the virus RNA and uses your cells to replicate that in the body, changing your cells DNA in the process. Hence the company name MODeRNA.

This technique has never been used before, ever, and they want to use it in a vaccine and inject that into 7 billion people without any long term trials. Who knows what it will do? It may irreversibly change humans at the fundamental level of their DNA so that you become something else – no longer the human – homosapien sapien – that God created in the Garden 6000 years ago, but some transhuman with your DNA owned by a company via the patents they own.

If a person is no longer human then the covenant that God made with the sons and daughters of Adam will no longer apply. This then makes a lot of sense. Such people would effectively become aliens. (I’ve seen sci-fi movies with plots where humans are converted to aliens through genetic manipulation.)

This gives us a clue as to why God, at Christ’s Second Advent, has determined to send all the unrepentant into the Lake of Fire. Could it be similar to the reason He sent a global flood to wipe out all life on Earth 4500 years ago?

Dr. Carrie Madej, DO is an Internal Medicine Specialist in McDonough, GA and has over 19 years of experience in the medical field. She graduated from Kansas City Univ Of Medicine Bioscience College Of Osteopathic Medicine medical school in 2001. She is affiliated with Southern Regional Medical Center. (Reference:

Watch this video! Dr. Carrie Madej explains the 3 major components of the Moderna vaccine and the implications.


Full Transcript of Dr. Carrie Madej: (bold emphases and editing are mine)

So what do you think about going from human 1.0 to human 2.0, and what does that mean? Well, going from humans as we now know ourselves to human 2.0 has something to do with transhumanism. If you’re not familiar with that term it’s about taking humans as we know ourselves and melding with artificial intelligence kind of like being in the Matrix if you’ve ever seen that movie.

And that may seem kind of cool to you. We might have some super human abilities maybe be able to think of something and it happens maybe have some physical abilities that would be almost super human-like. That’s the idea. That’s what you see in sci-fi movies. And for myself thinking about this topic. I’m like well I have some time. I think that’s many years in the future.

However, this question, this idea is now right in this moment. We need to make a decision. And I found out that we need to make a decision about this because I investigated the proposed COVID19 vaccine and this is my alarm call to the world.

I looked at the pros and cons and it frightens me. And I want you to know about this. You need to be very well informed because this new vaccine is not like your normal flu vaccine. This is something very different. This is something brand new. This is something completely experimental on the human race.

And it’s not just about being a different vaccine. There are technologies that are being introduced with this vaccine that can change the way we live, who we are and what we are. And very quickly.

I think that you know some people, that you might know these names, Elon Musk, who is the founder of SpaceX and Tesla Automotive as well as Ray Kurzweil, who is one of the bigwigs of Google. These are self-proclaimed transhumanists. They believe that we should go to human 2.0. And they are very big proponents of this. There’s a lot of other people, that you might know their names they’re also involved with this. So you should look that up.

I think the easiest way to explain this to you is to go with one of the front runners for the vaccine, and go into a little bit of the history. And tell you how they want to make the vaccine. And I think that will speak volumes. So, for instance, Moderna is one of the front runners for the COVID19 vaccine.

You should know that Moderna was founded by a person from Harvard, Derek Rossi. And this researcher actually was successful in taking some modified RNA and being able to reprogram a stem cell, in the body, and change the function of the stem cell. He actually made it genetically modified. Okay. So he proved that you can genetically modify something by using modified RNA.

So they founded the company, Moderna, on this concept. It’s kind of a new kid on the block. Okay. It’s not been around that long. In fact, it hasn’t even made any vaccine for a human before. It’s made no medicine for a human before. This will be their first run.

You must know that Moderna was in the news recently because it really fast-tracked. It’s like the other companies, it’s fast tracking the vaccine. It’s going from phase one to phase two very very quickly. In fact, it’s gone from phase one to phase three and its experiments, from March of this year until currently. I mean that is unbelievable. It usually takes five or six years. How are they able to do this with the safety and efficacy data that we need?

And I want you to know that in phase two they’re only using between 30 and 45 humans. In Moderna’s test study they only used 45 humans. And with the high dose vaccine group they got, 100 percent of those people got systemic side effects. One hundred! That’s only in the short side-effect profile.

In the low dose vaccine 80 percent got systemic side effects. Now we don’t even know the long-term side effects. From that we would need a lot longer time, right? Maybe years.

But we do know based on previous animal studies of using this technology that you can expect possibly increased cancer rates, increase mutant genes, mutagenesis, also increased autoimmune reactions.

For instance in some of the ferret studies they saw that when the ferret was introduced to the virus that they were trying to protect the ferret from, after the ferret got the vaccine, they actually had an exaggerated immune response. It actually hurt the ferret. They had more lung inflammation, more lung fluid even some problems with their liver. It actually hurt them. They had a poorer response. So those are longer term reactions and that could be seen with this vaccine but we don’t know the data yet. So it’s not without risk.

And how are they doing this? Well they’re actually suggesting to use a platform. Let me just explain how they would administer the vaccine. So the vaccine… There’s an idea called microneedle platform. Okay. This was developed by MIT and they said it could be very easily produced.

And mass-produced. This is why they’re proposing this technology and many millions of vaccines could be made quickly. They could also be administered by yourself. So the idea is to get a Band-aid. It looks like a Band-aid that you buy in the drugstore. It’s shipped to you through Amazon or UPS or some other shipping service. You take it out of the package. You put it on your hand like this and then you take the sticker off and, voila, you’ve been vaccinated.

So how is that possible? Well in this Band-aid it has little tiny spicules, little tiny needles. And this was designed after a snake viper fang bite … little snake bites. Anyway in these tiny little spicules, they claim you won’t really feel it that much, there’s their little Hydrogel. It’s a material called Hydrogel.

Inside the Hydrogel would be a Luciferase enzyme as well as the vaccine itself. So what is all that? First of all you’re getting the vaccine. It’s modified RNA or modified DNA. Let’s take Moderna; modified RNA.

So in that modified RNA, the idea is that the microneedles would puncture into your cell membrane. And this synthetic piece of an RNA — it’s a code for the part of the virus or they could use a synthetic DNA to code for the part of the virus that would go into your nucleus. Your body would start transcribing it; would start reading it and making more of that part of the virus.

Well why would we want to make more of the virus or part of the virus? The idea is your body would get used to seeing it, would know how to make antibodies, and would have an improved T cell response. And the idea is then when you saw it [the virus] in the future your body would already know how to fight it and it would be a better response. That’s the idea.

The problem with that is they’re using something, a process called transfection and transfection is a way that we make genetically modified organisms. Okay, I think you know about those fruits and vegetables. They’re not as healthy as the normal wild type fruit and
vegetables. So, possibly you could extrapolate that to a human.

If we become genetically modified, we would not be as healthy. Okay, we don’t have long-term studies on this anyway. This is unbelievable. And you know, the vaccine manufacturers have made the statement this will not alter our DNA, our genome.

I say that is not true. Because if we use this process to make a genetically modified organism, why would it not do the same thing to a human? I don’t know why they’re saying that.

Now if you look at the definition of transfection. It’ll tell you that it can be a temporary change in the cell. And I think that’s what the vaccine manufacturers are banking on … it’s temporary. Or it’s a possibility for it to become stable, to be taken up into the genome and so stable that it will start replicating when the genome replicates, meaning it is now permanent part of your genome. That’s a chance that we’re taking.

So it could be temporary or it could be permanent. And we would never know that for years down the road. Honestly, … so here we go. We’ve got something that can alter our genome. It’s a possibility. And another thing on that. If they’re altering the genome, what would be the effects? I told you previously some of the side effects but also we need to know that this is a synthetic piece of DNA or RNA.

If it becomes taken up into the genome of a human — it’s synthetic, it’s not from nature. And if you look at the Supreme Court justice ruling on synthetic DNA or genes — it can be patented. And patents have owners. So what does that mean for us? What if this gets into our genome? Does that mean Moderna or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation or the Department of Defense — all of these people who are involved in the patents — are they somehow going to own part of our genome? It’s a possibility. You need to know that. So that’s one part of this delivery system, just one.

Now let me go to the next. The next part of the delivery system is a Luciferase enzyme. Okay they named it, they patented it Luciferase. I don’t like that name. Luciferase, because it has bioluminescent qualities, which means it can produce a light or has a light source. And all of this would be under your skin and you cannot see it.

Now the Luciferase is an idea because they want to make sure that you’re vaccinated. They don’t trust medical records. They don’t trust you saying that you got vaccinated. They want to make sure. They want to make sure it was successful, a successful transfection, a successful gene modification. So when you get the Luciferase enzyme, if you have an iPhone or special app on the iPhone you can scan over that area and it will give a digital code, a digital imprint, a digital pattern, something that will identify that you were vaccinated.

It holds your vaccination record. It also gives you an ID, a number, a bar code, a branding, whatever you want to call it, a tattoo. It’s all the same thing. You now become like a product. So we have that now.

The third thing I mentioned was hydrogel. Hydrogel is actually an invention from DARPA (the Department of Advanced Research Projects Agency). This is kind of a sci-fi kind of a group from the Department of Defense, Pentagon of the US government. They make these fantastic inventions. One of them is Hydrogel.

You can look on YouTube. Look at Profusa. It is one of the companies. [Look for] DARPA as well as Hydrogel and you’ll find some little two-minute clips that they describe.

So hydrodyl is nanotechnology. Microscopic little robots and these little robots. Actually I know it sounds crazy. It’s still crazy to me, but it’s possible. They can disassemble reassemble assemble into and make different things. With this Hydrogel … it’s really nano technology. So that’s something, you know robotic or something. That’s artificial intelligence. It has the ability to connect with artificial intelligence.

This means that a human can now connect directly to and gather information from our bodies and gather it and connect with your smartphone, with the cloud, with some other smart device. And once this is done, this is 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.

Think about that! Think about how immediately that could change our privacy. Immediately can change our autonomy. Immediately change our freedoms. This can gather data like your blood sugar, your oxygen, your blood pressure. Okay, those sound great, but it also can gather many other things. It can gather, they say, your emotions or your menstrual cycle, your activity if you’ve fallen, your nutrients in your body, if you took medicines. It’s got a potential to see if you took illicit drugs. It’s got a potential to see almost anything that goes on in your body.

And all of this information is going where? That has not been addressed. Who’s protecting this information? What are they using it for? This is really serious stuff guys. This is all being proposed to be unveiled in the next vaccine.

The other thing to know is with this nanotechnology-Hydrogel-artificial-intelligence hook up, just like your cell phone, you can send a text message, you can send an email, but also you can receive them back. We can receive information. What information would be coming back into us? Would it affect our mood, our behavior? Would it affect how we how we think or our memories?

If you haven’t watched the movie Matrix I think you should. I think there’s some truth in that movie. I see so many wrong things with this vaccine and I see that we are not talking about it in the major media. And I feel that these companies are outright lying to us, when they say they cannot affect our DNA, because by all definitions that they are using, this can affect our DNA.

So guys I wanted to make this video short because I wanted to get the point across. I wanted you to really do your own research. So know that there are many risks that we’re seeing here. We really need to know if we really want to go from human 1.0 to human 2.0.

Let me also tell you that there’s some major names behind these vaccines. You’re always going to see, like the Department of Defense from the US government, sometimes DARPA like I told you. Why is the military involved with our vaccines? You see the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation everywhere with this. If you look you’ll find that name almost

And let’s go back to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Let’s look at the track record. Let’s look at what the man stands for. His family comes from a family of eugenics. What does eugenics mean? Population control meaning there’s too many people on the planet. It’s important to know.

He’s been on video stating that he thinks with a very good new vaccine we could get the earth’s population to be decreased by 10 to 15 percent. Well who’s going to stay and who’s going to go? And who is he to decide? He doesn’t have medical background, no epidemiology background, no science background. He’s not a doctor [but] a software tech. That’s what he has.

I’d also like you to realize; I always look at who’s has a vested interest. What are their motivations? What is his motivation? Right? We already know his family background.

What’s great concerning to me is that DARPA, this military agency, as well as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is very interested in something called gene drive research or technology or gene extinction technology. And it’s exactly what it sounds like.

By using genetic mutations, by use of transfection, for instance, you can exterminate an entire species from the planet. They are proposing to use this for mosquitoes, for instance, in Africa. But guys, our world is a delicate ecosystem. Who is saying one species goes? You destroy one species you could affect an entire ecosystem. So when you exterminate an entire species you will affect an entire ecosystem. It’s a very delicate balance and who is to say who’s going to stay and who’s going to go? Who’s got that knowledge? Why aren’t we talking about this? And guys if we can do it to an insect, we can do it to an animal, we can do it to a human.

I bring this up because if these agencies that are behind the vaccine also stand for that, do you trust them with your health? Do you trust them with your family? Do you trust them with our children?

The other thing is: we’re rushing this to production. What is the motivation behind that? We need to really think about this. I’ve also stated in the past that we need to know that there are, at least in the United States, there are mandates passed that make the vaccine manufacturers have no liability, zero liability, for any harm done to any human.

If people are killed, if they’re hurt, if they’re paralyzed, if they’re maimed, for life it doesn’t matter. You have no recourse and they still make all their profit. So there’s no incentive for them to make it safe anyway.

I also want you to know that one of the mandates — the emergency preparedness Act — that says they can force a vaccine on us. They cannot force a vaccine if there is a viable treatment for the COVID19. And I want you to know that doctors around the world are being censored about treatment options for COVID19, or, prevention for COVID19, because if there’s a true treatment or prevention then they can’t force this vaccine on us.

I want to bring that up because, what in the world is the motivation of doing this? Is it really in the health of all of us? As a doctor I can’t see how this is in the true health of the entire world. I think there’s another motive, another agenda, going on. The more I look at this, the more that comes up.

So I’ll leave you with this. I want to make this short and sweet. So that you can digest this and think about it. Do you really want to go to human 2.0? I don’t think it’s the fantasy you see in the movies.

We need to come together and we need to unify our voices because people in positions of power taking care of our health are not in our best interest. But together we have power to gather united our voice is strong. So I encourage you to do critical thinking.

Do your own research. Join groups in your state, go to your state legislature and you tell them no, no, to these experiments on humans. No to invasion of privacy, no to censorship. We are sovereign human souls and we need to take our rights back.

Thank you for listening and you know I always say my videos with the greatest of love and the greatest of peace. Thank you.

Join me on @GideonHartnett (join my group)

By John Gideon Hartnett

Dr John G. Hartnett is an Australian physicist and cosmologist, and a Christian with a biblical creationist worldview. He received a B.Sc. (Hons) and Ph.D. (with distinction) in Physics from The University of Western Australia, W.A., Australia. He was an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Outstanding Researcher Award (DORA) fellow at the University of Adelaide, with rank of Associate Professor. Now he is retired. He has published more than 200 papers in scientific journals, book chapters and conference proceedings.

7 replies on “Moderna vaccine may create transhumans”

Thanks for posting this. It is always good to know various view points.
However, have you taken a look at this
Please let me know what you think.
There is no question that we are living in times where the godless have enormous abilities of scientific knowledge and money and power, etc. And they too have a worldview.
Just as people who wrote the article at the link above have their own.
Nonetheless, any comments about the article at link above?


The article uses obfuscation. I’ll comment on a few items:

“There are 25 different candidate vaccines in clinical trials around the world according to the World Health Organization (WHO), but none of them will alter human DNA and they do not contain technology to link people up to an artificial intelligence interface.”

Your cannot trust the WHO. They lied about the coronavirus human to human transmission. They have lied about other issues also. They are primarily funded by Bill Gates and China so why would you trust anything they say about vaccines.

The Moderna vaccine does use a segment of the mRNA of the virus and it has the potential to insert itself into our DNA. The connection to artificial intelligence the doctor was referring to was the delivery system not the vaccine itself.

“Carrie Madej makes a number of other false claims, including that vaccine trials are ‘not following any sound scientific protocol to make sure this is safe’.”

This is true. Up to now no vaccine has used an inert placebo to test it against. So there can be no safety study especially on the long term effects. Many vaccines are tested for only a matter of days. The Oxford University / AstraZeneca COVID19 vaccine is tested against another dangerous vaccine as the control. I think it is one used for Meningitis. So Dr Madej is correct they are not following sound scientific protocol.

Besides that vaccine has already caused one case of Transverse Myelitis (TM) in the trail. This is a very serious inflammation of the spinal cord tissue and causes paralysis and even death. The trial has been paused. But probably a so-called ‘independent’ panel will convene and they will say that it was not the vaccine. Don’t forget the trial patients are not sick, they are healthy individuals.

A similar problem occurred with the Moderna vaccine in its trials. Several of a small group got seriously sick and had to be hospitalised.

“‘New vaccines undergo rigorous safety checks before they can be recommended for widespread use,’ says Michelle Roberts, BBC online health editor.”

If that was true they would use an inert placebo control group to see what the true safety is. But they don’t. However I recall that Del Bigtree ( through a lawsuit, has forced the US CDC to introduce an inert placebo to the safety study of the Moderna vaccine.


Thank you.

Btw, I miss your posts on cosmology, and of course, wanting to know more about the reality of asynchrony convention as it applies to HOW to understand it in reality. After all, we cannot simply get away with affirming YEC. We also HAVE TO accept YUC and then attempt to understand the how in the context of the words of God in the Holy Bible.

And like you, I too take a position based on the KJV. I will refer to other versions, yes, but when the final position needs to be taken, I will base it on the KJV. Those of us who have grappled with this issue know why we do so.



Yes, I have been side tracked lately but will get back to cosmology again soon. My health has improved out of site. Thank the Lord! So I am much more able to do these things again. No doubt you have read the last posts on the Conventionality Thesis, Can we see into the past, and the new starlight travel time problem presented by the Curse ?

As you say, I am a strong supporter of the KJV and the majority text upon which it is based. It is without a doubt, in my mind, the best translation available.


I had not read them; but I will now. Thank you for pointing out. I have the four articles from Jan-Jun 2019.

My concern is with the implications of the length contraction and time dilation issues when v=c, ie the velocity of the object (light photon in this case) is equal to the speed of causality.

When we put v=c in these two equations, the result is totally against our intuition, but the implication IS staggeringly clear! The object (light photon) has traveled the entire distance instantly from the viewer perspective. That is, the length has contracted to zero, implying the object is AT the destination, and in zero time! The viewer on earth sees the distance traveled by the photon contracted to zero; it is at the viewer eye, in utterly dilated time! That is the photon see no time elapse from the time it left the source to the time it touches a rod or a cone in our eye, or a ccd photocell.

It is these implications we would like more of your rigorous academic learning to be brought to bear upon.


Did you see these two?
Questions on the conventionality thesis and the one-way speed of light.
Einstein’s physics says there is no biblical creationist starlight travel-time problem.

Assuming the Anisotropic Synchrony Convention (ASC) there is no need for time dilation as a method to explain distant starlight. If you need to use it to explain some local physics it is far better to choose the Einstein Synchrony Convention (ESC) as it greatly simplifies the maths and since it is only a choice of a different convention there is no change to the physics.


Comments are closed.