Belief in God Biblical doctrines Book of Revelation Christianity hermeneutics Israel

The Old Testament Belongs to Christ and His People Alone — Why There Can Never Be A “Judeo-Christian” Anything

The following article was not written by me but I wholly agree with the message. The author writes what I have been led to believe, especially when you consider Revelation 14:1-5. There is no distinction between Jewish and non-Jewish believers. There is only the historical fact of those who were part of the nation of Israel and came to trust in Jesus Christ. See my comments on Revelation 14 here.

by Pastor Andrew Isker

Within conservative circles, particularly among evangelicals in that court, it is not uncommon to hear the phrase “Judeo-Christian”. This expression often modifies something that pertains to the history or tradition of Christendom. Most people think nothing of it. They are familiar enough with the Bible to know that the Old Testament is about Israel and the Hebrews, and the New Testament is about Christ incarnating to Israel and going to all the nations. But the reality is that Christianity was not formed out of this thing called “Judaism.” Christianity is the true biblical religion, and Judaism is the religion formed after faithful Jews, and believing Gentiles, were united to Jesus Christ.

Objecting to “Judeo-” modifying Christianity may seem pedantic. It may seem like much ado about nothing. What is the big deal if “Judeo-“ modifies “Christian”? After all, it’s just one additional word. But the question of whether Christ was co-eternal with the Father or was created was literally over a single letter (iota). Words matter. Definitions matter. They carry tremendous significance. The problem with the phrase is that it reveals our misunderstanding of what the Old Testament is, and who the people of God were, in the Old Testament. The phrase reveals our misunderstanding of the meaning of the coming of Jesus Christ. Most importantly, it reveals our misunderstanding of the relationship between biblical Israel and modern Jewish identity.

To start, we should back up and understand some grand themes of the Bible. Right after God dispersed the nations at the tower of Babel (Genesis 11), He called a descendant of Shem to go to the land of Canaan (Gen. 12). He then made promises to this man, that he and his descendants would possess this land (Gen. 15), and that this promised seed would come through Him (Gen. 17), and they were instructed to keep a special sign of this promise in the act of circumcision (v. 10-14). However, this man Abraham and his descendants were not the only people who believed in God.

Throughout the Old Testament, other people also knew of our God, either by the faith passed down from the time of Noah or through the ministry of Abraham’s descendants. The entire time you had both the priestly people, through whom the promised Messiah would come, and also believers within the nations of the world such as Melchizedek (Gen. 14), Jethro (Ex. 2), Rahab (Josh 2), the Queen of Sheba (1 Kings 10), Naaman the Syrian (2 Kings 5), the people of Nineveh (Jonah 3-4), and Nebuchadnezzar (Daniel 4). Throughout the Old Testament, there are believing Gentiles.

By the time you get to the New Testament, Jesus and the Apostles are constantly bumping into Gentile God-fearers (Matt. 15:21-28; Luke 7:1-10; Acts 10; Acts 13:26; Acts 17:4, 17). That division, between Jew and Gentile, was coming to a close with the ending of the Old Covenant order. By the time of Pentecost (Acts 2), after Christ’s resurrection and ascension, the Babelic order is reversed and the Jew/Gentile distinction is torn down. The nations all have one tongue again, the confession that Jesus Christ is Lord. The nations not hubristically building a tower to the heavens but instead, bowing before the one who has ascended into heaven and thereby exalting His holy name.

The union of Jew and Gentile into the church is perhaps the main theme of the New Testament. It is unquestionably the main theme of the Book of Romans. Many people read Romans as though it is primarily a theological treatise. Still, the theology of the Apostle Paul’s epistle to the Romans is an outworking of the issue of Israel and the Gentiles being joined into one body. Paul gives a defense of the justice of God. He goes on to write about how God would harden the hearts of Israelites so that they would demand the murder of Christ and thus bring about the salvation of the entire world (Rom. 9-11).

By the time he gets to chapter 11, he explains the union of Jew and Gentile as the covenant people united in Christ (Rom. 11:26). He also tells of a future conversion of Israel before God brings judgment down upon the Old Covenant order and Babylon the Great which is Jerusalem (Rev. 18). Just as Paul prophesied, there indeed was a mass conversion of Jews right before the Romans came to destroy Israel (Rev. 11:1-13, 14:1-20). God used His salvation of the Gentiles to provoke the full remnant of Israel to repent and believe in the Messiah, just as Paul said He would when he said, “and so all Israel will be saved.”

All Israel” is the full sum of the Jews who confessed Christ before God sent the judgment upon Jerusalem — prophesied by Jesus in Matthew 24 and revealed in the Book of Revelation. Covenant-breaking Israel and its leprous temple were destroyed. Faithful Israel, united by the faithful Israelite Jesus Christ (the heir of all the promises given to Abraham, Moses, and David) was also joined to the Gentile believers.

Far from being a “replacement” for Israel, it is a fulfillment. No one would say that a family with five natural children that adopts a baby is “replacing” the natural children, even if one of the older children ran away and disowned his parents. The faithful remnant of Israel, the true Israel was preserved. It was joined to Christ along with Gentile believers. When God sent the Assyrians and Babylonians to destroy covenant-breaking Israel and Judah, centuries before Christ, no one would ever think to say to the idolaters being destroyed, “don’t worry guys, all those promises God made to Abraham are irrevocable! You’ll be fine!” No, the prophet Jeremiah told them explicitly not to look at these promises to protect them from the consequences of their disobedience: 

Thus says the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel: “Amend your ways and your doings, and I will cause you to dwell in this place. Do not trust in these lying words, saying, ‘The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord are these.”

Jeremiah 7:3–4

The promises are irrevocable to Israel, and Israel is defined in terms of the covenant with God. That covenant directs Israel to join with His Son, and if Israel fails to do it, they are no different than their fathers who God destroyed and sent into exile for their idolatry. Yet, God preserves a remnant and His covenant and its promises remain intact. That is the point of Romans 11.

What about Jews today?

It is impossible to overstate the importance of the historic cataclysm that was the Destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 AD. That was God’s conclusive, final judgment on the Old Covenant. It is over. No more sacrifices only The Sacrifice. His covenant and His promises exclusively belong to the true Israel, Jesus Christ. There was no more priesthood, only the True High Priest, Jesus Christ. The only thing that remained was the traditions of the scribes and the elders, the very traditions that were crafted to allow Israel to violate God’s Law, the very traditions Christ demanded Israel repent over, and the very traditions that provoked them to reject Him and put Him to death. That is what modern Judaism was formed out of. This was not a correct understanding of the Scriptures, because if they truly had the eyes to see, they would have comprehended the majesty and divinity in Christ Jesus!

So the claim that “the Old Testament came from Judaism” is patently false. Judaism is a new religion created after the Old Covenant was destroyed. It is a faith that is built out of the codified traditions of the elders that Christ forcefully condemned. The faith of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and David is the faith of Jesus Christ and Him alone. The Old Testament “belongs” to the cult formed after Christ called “Judaism” as much as the Bible “belongs” to cults like the Jehovah’s Witnesses or Mormons. Modern Jews today are no more “God’s chosen, special people” than Muslims or Buddhists. That faithful remnant of Israel united to Jesus Christ are “God’s chosen, special people” not the branches that have been grafted out of the olive tree. Modern Jews are not “Old Testament-only pre-Christians.” Judaism today is a modern LARP religion, no different than guys who dress up and howl out in the woods to Odin and Thor.

If the church were to understand this—that modern Ashkenazis and Sephardi are not “the special people” but no different than Ghanaians, Koreans, or Brazilians—we may actually be able to evangelize them effectively. They are not the special people that don’t need Jesus. Their religion is fake and a bad joke. It is a false religion like all other false religions. Only repentance and faith in Jesus Christ will save them. Far from being “antisemitic,” a proper understanding of this shows heartfelt concern for their souls! If you have the compassion that a Christian must-have for the lost, you need to understand that their religion is not “just like ours but without the New Testament.” If they reject Jesus, they reject the Old Testament that is all about Him. All mankind need to believe in Him or they will perish in their sins.

This is why “Judeo-Christian” is such a problem. Judaism is a new, made-up religion by those who rejected Jesus Christ. It is not the precursor to Christianity; it postdates it. By using that term we are reinforcing the idea that their religion is just like ours except they don’t believe in Jesus yet, when in reality it is a new religion formed out of the total rejection of the Son of God. The very best thing the church can do for modern Jews is to heighten the distinction between Christianity and their false religion. Only then can they come to know salvation in Christ.

Sourced from Gab News

Andrew Isker is the pastor of 4th Street Evangelical Church in Waseca, MN. He is a graduate of Minnesota State University and Greyfriar’s Hall Ministerial Training School, and he has served churches in Missouri, West Virginia, and Minnesota. He is the author of the forthcoming book, The Boniface Option. Andrew, his wife Kara, and their five children reside in his hometown of Waseca, MN. He can be found on Gab @BonifaceOption.

Comments welcome below.

Join me on @GideonHartnett 

If you want to be notified by email each time I add a new post click the “Email” button below and add your email address.

Recommended Reading

By John Gideon Hartnett

Dr John G. Hartnett is an Australian physicist and cosmologist, and a Christian with a biblical creationist worldview. He received a B.Sc. (Hons) and Ph.D. (with distinction) in Physics from The University of Western Australia, W.A., Australia. He was an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Outstanding Researcher Award (DORA) fellow at the University of Adelaide, with rank of Associate Professor. Now he is retired. He has published more than 200 papers in scientific journals, book chapters and conference proceedings.

4 replies on “The Old Testament Belongs to Christ and His People Alone — Why There Can Never Be A “Judeo-Christian” Anything”

Their religion IS “fake and a bad joke” however it’s hard to see how he’s correct that pentecost signals the end of Jewish/, Gentile division.

“For you first”(Acts 3:26) and it wasn’t until Cornelius that the door was opened for gentiles! If the division was ended at pentecost how come gentiles weren’t included until later and even then as wild olive branches grafted contrary to nature? In 13:14 Paul is still attending synagogue on the Sabbath and preaching to Jews first (v46) as a matter of principle. In 21:26 Paul is making sacrifices in the temple and in 23:6 he still calls himself “a pharisee” and by the time he reaches Rome in 28:20 he is “wearing this chain for the sake of the hope of Israel”.
In Romans 9-11 he is still asserting Jewish priority and covenant status “if God did not spare the NATURAL branches he will not spare YOU (gentiles) either ”

Best to see Acts 28:28 as indicative of the end and Ephesians 3:1-10 as the revelation of the present age in which gentiles ARE joint heirs, members and partakers with believing Jews. But can one really believe Dr Hartnett that eg Ezekiel 40:40-43 is not literal and God is not going to fulfill the disciples hopes in Acts 1:6-7?


Ezekiel 40:40-43 is literal but it is in reference to the restoration of animal sacrifice in the 2nd Temple. The vision was given during the captivity. As to the question asked in Acts 1:6-7 scripture is clear that Christ kingdom is not of this world He is not going to restore the nation of Israel. John 18:36 says it all

“Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.”

When Jesus said “now” He means in the spirit, in the souls He has gathered, the Elect of God. There is no kingdom of God in the physical sin-cursed world. His kingdom is in our hearts. And it does not matter at all about ethnicity, skin colour, sex, employment status, or whatever.

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus” Galatians 3:28

“Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all.” Colossians 3:11


The temple in Ezekiel though is vastly different to the second though isn’t it?
Jesus reply to the disciples “it is not for you to know times or seasons which the father has fixed” taken at face value implies it will be fulfilled and stating that his kingdom is from heaven doesn’t stop it from coming down and being realized on earth surely,?
Colossians was after Acts 28 and Galatians if taken to mean no difference between Jew and gentile clearly contradicts Romans 9-11 eg “wild olive branches grafted contrary to nature” wouldn’t you agree?


Ezekiel prophesied during the last days of the captivity in Babylon. The prophesy in Chapter 40 and beyond in regards to the Temple can only be a reference to the second Temple. I can’t see how it is any different. It is the same thing.

Jesus kingdom on earth is not in this current physical realm because we live in a sin-cursed world. Only after the Day of the Lord and after the Earth is renovated and all the relics of man are burned up, turned to base elements, and a New Earth created, can God bring down His heavenly city. 2 Peter 3:10-13.

The reference to “wild olive branches grafted contrary to nature” means that some who were once professing Jews will be saved by grace and profess Jesus as Lord and Messiah. That is in no way a reference to national salvation of Israel or ethnic salvation of the Jews because of their ancestry. That would be contrary to most of the book of Romans. “There is no Jew or Greek…” No difference between Jew and Gentile for salvation. Galatians 3:28. Colossians 3:11.

God’s chosen people were once the nation of Israel, but even then those saved were by faith, not by national identity. After Christ paid the ultimate penalty for sin on the Cross He finished all sacrifice for sin. He ALONE brought in reconciliation for iniquity, an end of sin (Daniel 9:24) and the Temple veil was rent, showing the Holy of Holies empty because Christ is the propitiation for our sins (1 John 2:2). He expiated our sins. His work was finished on the Cross for all those who believe. John 19:30. There is no other way, but through Christ’s shed blood. John 14:6.

Thus need of a “special people” in Israel and by extension the nation of Israel itself is no more. I think you misunderstand Romans 9-11. There is no contradiction. God is sovereign and has chosen His elect as the chosen people. These are all those predestined before the foundation of the world (Ephesians 1:4-5). This is what Romans 9:11-26 is about. By election God chose, not by national identity. And those chosen is only by His good pleasure (Isaiah 46:10).

Modern Israel as a nation today is not relevant to biblical history. It is a nation state where most citizens are either atheists or followers of a false religion (Judaism). The Jews rejected Christ 2000 years ago and most reject Him today. Jerusalem is called “Sodom and Egypt” (Revelation 11:8).

There is no Jewish gene, so you cannot say they have some special privilege to salvation because of their Jewishness. If anyone should be called Israel it is Jesus Christ. In Him we are spiritual Israel. After Christ made the ultimate sacrifice, God’s message (the gospel) has been to all, both Jew and Gentile. There is no privileged or special way to salvation for any.

Galatians 6:15,16 “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision avails any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature. 16 And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.”


Comments are closed.