Recently Prof. Masanori Fukushima, MD, Ph.D, Japan’s most foremost oncologist, condemns the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, calling those who believe in them as following a religion, a cult, and not science. [Note: Oncology is a branch of medicine that deals with the study, treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of cancer.] By no means is he an anti-vaxxer.
It is interesting to hear Prof Fukushima introduce himself. If you read the “brought to you by Pfizer” mainstream media and fake fact-checking websites, they simply paint Prof Fukushima as a fringe anti-vaxxer. But when you hear about his history, you get a sense that this was someone highly prominent before he went against the narrative of “safe and effective.”
aussie17.com (Source)
Below is an English translation of his talk. If you know the Japanese language well, you can listen to him on a video on X.com or on Odysee.com.
Transcript
I am the most senior medical oncologist in Japan. I have campaigned to popularize and establish this discipline as a new term.
I was the first to open a cancer outpatient clinic at Kyoto University, and before that, at Kyoto University, in 2020. I was serving as the medical oncologist of a section at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. That’s why I established the first course in pharmacoepidemiology at Kyoto University in Japan.
There is a reason for what’s being called “turbo cancer,” a type previously unseen by doctors, characterized by its incredibly fast speed. By the time it’s discovered, it is already in stage four, advanced cancer, and such cases are starting to sporadically appear in consultations. Thus, doctors began sharing information about these extraordinary cases that are different from before. So, this has gradually become the situation since last year or the year before that. Indeed, doctors have been sensing from the field that something unusual related to cancer may be happening.
Moreover, the results of our analysis show, surprisingly, that specific types of cancer, in relation to the vaccination, seem to be experiencing excess mortality. Firstly, cancers such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, thyroid cancer, and then statistically, esophageal and lung cancer. Another one is prostate cancer in men. Such cancers are specifically causing excess mortality. This phenomenon cannot be simply explained by disruptions such as early screenings being unavailable due to the pandemic, or lost opportunities for treatment.
Among the cases I reviewed, some underwent autopsies revealing that the vaccine literally caused the heart to disintegrate. A 28-year-old man, who had never been to a doctor before, died due to myocardial infarction following the abduction of his myocardium five days after receiving his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine. When his wife tried to wake him in the morning, she found him dead. Naturally, the police were called, and he was taken to a university hospital where an autopsy was performed. The doctor who did the autopsy said that when he tried to remove the heart, it was soft and disintegrated. The heart disintegrated. It became soft. Such cases exist, and even just one case like this shows how dangerous this vaccine can be.
So from my perspective, it’s severe for healthy people, those who had never been ill before, to be vaccinated and then die. It’s serious. It’s essentially murder! I want to state clearly that this is my view. I believe this is a serious matter. Regarding this, the media does not report it properly, and the newspapers do not cover it.
This is certainly distorted. I am now deeply concerned not only about a crisis in medicine but also about a significant crisis in science and democracy. I am increasingly alarmed as a scientist and a doctor. This vaccine should not have been administered at the national level, and it should not have been approved and brought to market at this point in time.
The idea that the WHO would lead a uniform vaccination program in countries with differing medical circumstances, habits, and systems is fundamentally flawed. Vaccination directed by the WHO across all these diverse conditions is fundamentally incorrect. Health care varies according to people’s lifestyle habits, medical systems, and the legal systems and cultures of their countries. Therefore, promoting vaccines on a global scale uniformly, whether they are genetic vaccines or not, is somewhat absurd. Just because vaccines for natural diseases have been successful doesn’t guarantee the same success for COVID-19 vaccines. As we’ve seen, flu vaccines have not been successful. Despite reports decades ago indicating flu vaccines were ineffective, they are still promoted vigorously, which is insane! This isn’t science, it’s more akin to religious faith, hysteria, or even cult behavior in my opinion.
Opposing vaccines is making one a heretic like Galileo. It’s become like being treated as a complete outcast. That’s the situation. It’s madness. The WHO should not have the capacity to do this. The WHO is aware that there has been harm caused by vaccines, and in order to compensate, it offers damage relief systems to some countries, specifically to developing countries. Europe, America, China, Japan, and Korea all have relief systems in place for victims. Depending on which product, liability cannot be demanded by us which I believe is absolutely ridiculous.
Moreover, the WHO should not have the capacity to use such power as it does not possess a sufficient scientific basis, making it highly irresponsible. It’s my fundamental belief that national governments should not entrust the WHO with such decision-making. This is a fundamental stance.
Take the studies comparing Israel, Palestine, Jordan, Syria, and Egypt. Israel led in early and widespread vaccination but also had the highest death and infection rates. The less aggressively vaccinated areas saw less harm. I believe Israel was quick to halt the vaccine. Therefore, with such facts, the WHO should be responsible for investigating and reporting the outcomes of global vaccination efforts as well as the damages, and the deficits caused by them, and should issue a report. It’s crucial that the WHO takes responsibility for this. The WHO is not addressing it.
Moreover, genetic vaccines are completely useless. Introducing genes into humans is gene therapy. I question the rationale behind using such a method as a vaccine. When administering messenger RNA based on nano-particles, it results in off-target effects. This includes the ovaries and also affects the brain, liver, spleen, and bone marrow. The major concern is its migration to the bone marrow. Then there’s the impact on the ovaries and other reproductive organs. Moreover, spike proteins are detected in the skin with bumps even after more than a year. This indicates that the production of spike proteins is predictable. The issue is spike proteins shouldn’t persist for a year. It indicates a severe problem.
Recent findings such as those from Kochi University in Japan underline these issues suggesting the WHO hastily promoted the vaccines without proper review. I argue the WHO should be responsible for the outcome. I view it as an abuse, misuse of science – an evil practice of science to be frank.
I have been skeptical about vaccines from the beginning not getting the flu vaccine either. I thought they were ridiculous, and so I didn’t get one either. Those who suffered or died from these vaccines, like a 28-year-old man leaving behind a baby. Imagine finding your spouse dead in the morning. It’s no joke. The vaccine caused such an outcome! Even a single death is unacceptable. However, in Japan, there are reports of over two thousand deaths. More than 2000 people have died. They died because of the vaccine.
There are 2,134 reported death cases. This number wasn’t compiled by me, this is a figure officially reported by the government and posted online. These are cases of death. Currently, there are tens of thousands of people who must see a doctor due to vaccine-related issues. 30% of these are suffering from ME (Myalgic Encephalo-myelitis) or CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome). These conditions still lack a conclusive treatment. There is ongoing research by my colleagues indicating Vitamin D might be effective against these conditions, and a paper is currently being prepared.
We really must take these damages seriously and address them earnestly. Any efforts to dismiss these damages as if they didn’t happen are, frankly, the work of evil. This is a quintessential example of the evil practice of science.
It’s as if we’ve opened Pandora’s box and are now encountering all sorts of diseases. We’re facing them. Autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and infections. All of these, including rare and difficult diseases, and even rare conditions are happening. Even diseases unheard of are being encountered by ordinary doctors.
This type of DDS (Drug Delivery System), utilizing lipid nanoparticles, is a total failure. Therefore I believe this vaccine was from the beginning based on misconception, misconduct, and evil practices of science, totally defective, founded on misconceptions, leading to a totally false production, a false product.
As someone who was the first to establish pharmacology and epidemiology in Japan, I feel responsible though I am retired. I still chair a research institute, and since science is my field of study, I continue it as my mission. But now coming to this point, all scientists are hesitating. Moreover, as panelists, they are engaging in censorship. This is the collapse of the scientific community. It’s a great defeat. Such things should never happen.
…
We must confront this directly again and shine the light of science on it, so the WHO should lead a comprehensive outcome research on this gene vaccine used on humanity on a large scale for the first time, and all countries should cooperate with it.
We should never again use such vaccines. This is a shame for humanity. It’s a disgrace that we did this. That’s what I believe. I mean it seriously. Seriously. I’ve been serious. I haven’t said this before. I’ve been holding back, but this is an international issue. And with WHO involved with such an attitude of treating science like it’s something casual, that’s wrong.
Without a firm attitude, science is over once it’s compromised. Science is always about destroying past concepts and knowledge. That’s science. Clinging to past knowledge and applying it is religion, a faith. Science is not religion.
See also
Recommended Reading
- Book: Apocalypse Now: On the Revelation of Jesus Christ
- Book: Merchants of Death: Global Oligarchs and Their War On Humanity
Follow me
- Telegram.org: @GideonHartnett
- Facebook: Gideon Hartnett
- X (Twitter): @gideon195203
To be notified by email put your email address in the box at the bottom of your screen. You’ll get an email each time we publish a new article.
Click this image to make a secure Donation (Stripe) !
Bible Science Forum 
Leave a comment