A subscriber to my blog here sent me the screen shots and text of a reply he got back from Creation Ministries International (CMI) when he asked by email the question “Does CMI still promote Covid vaccines, especially in light of all the negative VAERS data about them?
Based on the underreporting factor of 100:1 (1% reported) this current report means in effect 3.8 million have died from COVID vaccines. This figure is largely for the US population. Add to that the rest of the world and Prof. Denis Rancourt’s figure of 17 million deaths worldwide up to end of 2023 comes to mind. See Physicist Denis Rancourt Shows COVID Shots Caused 17 Million Deaths Worldwide
The follow is the reply my subscriber got back in response from CMI.
Jonathan Sarfati
Staff – 2025-03-20 7:49 PMDear Mr Gibson
CMI still supports Covid vaccination. I have received 9 shots with no problems and no Covid.
What VAERS data do you think should change our minds? As explained in my article, the R in VAERS stands for Reporting, not verification. The VAERS database itself cautions:
In accessing the database we encourage consumers to understand that a report of an adverse event does not necessarily indicate there is a causal link between a medicine and an adverse outcome.
Then it would be important to compare the VAERS numbers with the total number who received vaccines to obtain a risk percentage. In USA, the total number of fully vaccinated people is 230 million, so the VAERS total must be divided by that, and this would be a worst-case scenario where all the reports turned out to be proofs of vax-causation.
Then compare with the alternative. When Covid first hit, the population was unvaccinated. At first it killed about 3%. After many of the most vulnerable people had lost their lives, and with better treatment methods developed, the case fatality rate dropped to about 1%. My calculations suggest that the vaccine was about 100× safer, even if the VAERS reports really were proofs (arguendo), i.e. at most a risk of about 1 in 10,000.
My article also points out that General Washington ordered the whole Continental Army to be variolated to protect against smallpox that was killing more troops than the British Regulars were. The only exemptions were proven smallpox survivors with scars to prove it. Variolation was a pre-vaccination inoculation. The Puritan Cotton Mather had promoted variolation, and his revolutionary studies of comparative mortality suggested that variolation was 10% as risky as smallpox. This was no small risk—the great Puritan theologian Jonathan Edwards died after variolation. But General Washington thought the risk was acceptable and necessary, and it arguably helped win American Independence.
Are we supposed to be more American than Washington, in opposing a vaccine that is only at most 1% as risky as Covid, i.e. 10× the risk-benefit of variolation vs smallpox? Especially soldiers who refused the vaccine, unlike the Continental soldiers who accepted variolation.
Blessings,
Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., F.M.
Author, speaker, apologist, Head Scientist, CMI–USACreation Ministries International (US)
Phone: (770) 439-9130; Fax: (770) 439-9784
Website: creation.com
The smallpox treatment at that time was using the pus of the cowpox pustules, the method of Jenner from which many died or suffered seriously, got tuberculosis and other diseases. Jenner experimented on his own son with his cow pus variolation method putting dirty pus into the broken skin. His son died around 20 years old from tuberculosis. And smallpox was not a disease eradicated by a vaccine. Read the following pieces.
- The History of Vaccines Exposed
- Have Any Vaccines Ever Reduced Mortality from Infectious Diseases?
- The Poisoned Needle
- There Was No Pandemic, But Excess Deaths
You’ll notice from the above plot that the diseases shown had continuously reducing mortality as time proceeded and that was long before any vaccine. The real cause of the reduction in deaths was improvement in community cleanliness, the invention of closed sewers, iceboxes and refrigeration, the access to improved quality of food and clean water.
It is noteworthy that scarlet fever mortality went to almost zero despite there never being a vaccine ever deployed.
I have previously reported on my efforts to scientifically review and critique the use of murdered baby parts in medical developments especially vaccines and the view that CMI has taken, particularly in regards to the COVID vaccines.
- Why Has Creation Ministry International (CMI) Bought into the COVID-19 Vaccine Lie and Other Lies?
- Using Aborted Babies For Vaccines Is Never Justified
- Fetal Cells Used in Vaccine Production
My point in those pieces was not primarily about adverse events but the immorality of using murdered baby parts in vaccines and any medical development because nearly all medical research nowadays involves the fetal tissues harvested from aborted babies. I mean the organs and tissues currently being harvested and sold to medical research. To be clear I am not suggesting that CMI condones that practice but that they have taken a pragmatic view to accept all modern medicines and to keep believing in the purity of big Pharma to develop medicines making life better for us all. I disagree.
Sin is dominant in the world and the prince of the air controls the pharmakia (aka witchcraft) industry of drug developments. Why would you expect the medical industry elites to be free from avarice and greed? In fact, I expect that their passions are ruled by the wicked one, so why would you trust them, especially to get to the truth in the peer-review system that is plagued with so much corruption? Some estimate that 50% of all papers published in the medical journals are fraudulent. See Published Retractions.
The following was a study published in The Lancet medical journal in 2022. Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) COVID vaccines compared with Incident Rate Ratio (IRR). This must be what Dr Sarfati is quoting in his 1 in 10,000 adverse event ratio.
Would you take a vaccine with a risk factor of acute myocarditis and death of 1 in 10,000? I wouldn’t but a number of my friends did and they have serious heart damage and sadly one even died from it.
Then there is this Letter published in the Virology Journal on June 5, 2022.
Recently, The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals.
To date, when comparing the advantages and disadvantages of mRNA vaccines, vaccination has been commonly recommended. As the COVID-19 pandemic becomes better controlled, vaccine sequelae are likely to become more apparent. It has been hypothesized that there will be an increase in cardiovascular diseases, especially acute coronary syndromes, caused by the spike proteins in genetic vaccines [18, 19]. Besides the risk of infections owing to lowered immune functions, there is a possible risk of unknown organ damage caused by the vaccine that has remained hidden without apparent clinical presentations, mainly in the circulatory system. (my emphases added)
The New England Journal of Medicine (June 15, 2022) study showed that the COVID mRNA vaccine effectiveness turns negative after 6 months after 2 doses while prior infection retains strong effectiveness against infection for at least a year. Boosters are needed every 6 months to maintain protection but that protection is about the same as prior infection of the disease. Could that be why Dr. Sarfati has now had 9 shots? See also Sixth Study Confirms Negative Efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA Injections
And the prior infection must have been the seasonal influenza because it allegedly disappeared in 2020/21.
Then there was the work by a team of 22 leading researchers at the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) who analyzed the records of a whopping 99,068,901 “vaccinated” people for the peer-reviewed study published in the journal Vaccine in 2024. In total, the study investigated 183,559,462 doses of mainly Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca.
For the heart diseases myocarditis and pericarditis, respectively, they detected 610% (by 2nd dose Moderna) and 691% (by 3rd dose AstraZeneca) higher disease rate in those injected with the bioweapon shots compared to pre-COVID controls.
See COVID-19 Vaccine: The Hidden Truth Behind Safety Signals
There have been cases documented where the trial data were fraudulently manipulated. Why should this be any different? Besides research has shown that the unvaccinated are by far healthier than the vaccinated. See Unvaccinated Are Healthier Than Vaccinated.
Then there are the known WHO programs in Africa (Kenya and other countries) where secretly an infertility drug was inserted into a tetanus vaccine. See Exposed — WHO Depopulation Program Through Infertility Vaccines. That was a deliberate program to reduce the population of black Africans.
Then Dr Sarfati uses a very unscientific statement to try and convince his audience why they should take a COVID mRNA bioweapon shots. He uses himself as sample size of 1, stating that he has had 9 shots of the drugs and he has had no problems and has contracted no Covid.
Well, I can match that also with an unscientific statement. I have had no shots, and I have had no problems and have never contracted Covid. In fact I have not even had any influenza in the period 2020 to 2025. I don’t remember the last time I had the flu it is so long ago.
The Covid plandemic was a complete scam. This is evidenced by the alleged near non-existence of the flu in 2020-21 when Covid was so prevalent as we were told by the mainstream media propaganda machine. Covid was the flu relabelled as something else. It may have been a bad year for flu but the mortality was largely by medical practice using ventilators and remdesivir a drug so deadly its use was discontinued during Ebola trials.
We should never forget the evil exists and the heart of man is deceitful and desperately wicked.
9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
Jeremiah 17:9 AKJV
But the Lord tries the heart and eventually gives everyone according to their actions. Judgment will follow for those who deceived so many, by scaring the weak-minded into taking a “slow-kill” bioweapon shot.
Related Reading
- There Never Was a Pandemic! We Were All Scammed!
- The Deception of Virology & Vaccines – Why Coronavirus Is Not Contagious
- Cancer | Caused by Parasites | New Treatment Protocol Explained
Free Subscribers
Subscribe to our Newsletters as a Free Subscriber and be notified by email. Just put your email address in the box at the bottom of your screen.
You’ll get an email each time we publish a new article. It is quick and easy to do and totally free. You only need do it once.
Premium Subscribers
Subscribe to our Newsletters as a Premium Subscribers at $5 USD/month or $30 USD/year (you choose).
Paid Premium Subscribers will get exclusive access to certain content I publish, which I expect to be about 4 exclusive posts per month. That will only cost you a cup of coffee per month.
Also you’ll get access to download, for free, a PDF of my book Apocalypse Now. You can download it from a Premium members only post here.
And now you’ll get exclusive access to the chapters (in their initial draft form) to my new book with working title “The Physics of Creation”; plus eventually a PDF of the final compiled book.
This is how you can support my work. I have been publishing this website for 10 years now and up to 2024 I never asked for any support.
Press the button “Premium” on the front page to find a list of Premium content. Over time that list will grow. Thanks so much to all supporters.
At a minimum, please join as a Free Subscriber. It’ll cost you nothing. It may also help me beat the shadow banning of some posts.
Bible Science Forum 
Leave a reply to johngcope Cancel reply