Man with glasses studying a large antique book at a library table.
A biblical scholar meticulously examines an historic manuscript of the Greek Septuagint (LXX).

In the first few centuries after Christ when early church scholars needed a reliable canonical trusted translation of the Old Testament scriptures, why did the Church Fathers all insist it was a great error to translate from the Hebrew language versions given them by the Jews, instead of the Greek Septuagint (LXX) trusted by the Apostles?

The so-called “Hebrew Bible” (Old Testament), the Masoretic text, was contemporaneously written by Jewish translators who cut out words and phrases that Christians could use against them. That is, cut words out of the Septuagint to create the version, which was accepted by the Reformers as the purest form of the Hebrew scriptures. The corruptions related to the OT prophecies of the coming Messiah being fulfilled by Jesus Christ.

However after the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in the period 1947-1956 they revealed that the Greek Septuagint is a much more accurate reflection of the original than the Hebrew Bible. Readings of the Dead Sea Scrolls align much more closely with the LXX than with the Masoretic Text.

For an excellent analysis of the Septuagint and the corruptions introduced by the rabbis read: Introducing “Stola Scriptura: How the Enemies of Christ Schemed to Steal the Scriptures”

So the question might be asked what downstream effect has the corruption of the Hebrew Bible had on our understanding of the prophecies predicting the coming and office of Jesus Christ as Messiah? And what effect has it had on eschatology?

Below I compare the same passage of Daniel 9:24-27 from English translations of the Septuagint (LXX) and the Masoretic Text (MT). For the Septuagint I have used the LXXE and for the MT I have used the Authorised King James Version (KJV).

The passage in Daniel 9 is the very famous 70 weeks prophecy from God revealed to Daniel about the greatest event in history after the creation itself. It foretells the coming of the Messiah, the Christ, the anointed one, Who gives His life for many on the cross. The Hebrew word שָׁבֻעַ (shabua) used in the prophecy is translated as “weeks” in English has the literal meaning of 7. So 70 “weeks” equals 70 x 7 = 490 years, after which Christ was crucified in Jerusalem.

See Daniel 9 Prophecy and Daniel’s Seventy Weeks.

For a comparison of the verses in Daniel 9:24-27 taken from the Septuagint (LXXE) and Masoretic Text (KJV) they are best displayed in 2 columns on a desktop.


24 Seventy weeks have been determined upon thy people, and upon the holy city, for sin to be ended, and to seal up transgressions, and to blot out the iniquities, and to make atonement for iniquities, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal the vision and the prophet, and to anoint the Most Holy. Daniel 9:24 LXXE

24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. Daniel 9:24 KJV

25 And thou shalt know and understand, that from the going forth of the command for the answer and for the building of Jerusalem until Christ the prince there shall be seven weeks, and sixty-two weeks; and then the time shall return, and the street shall be built, and the wall, and the times shall be exhausted. Daniel 9:25 LXXE

25 Know therefore and understand, (that) from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince (shall be) seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times. Daniel 9:25 KJV

26 And after the sixty-two weeks, the anointed one [Christ] shall be destroyed, and there is no judgment in him: and he [Christ] shall destroy the city [Jerusalem] and the sanctuary [the Temple] with the prince that is coming: they shall be cut off with a flood [Greek: cataclysm, 70AD], and to the end of the war which is rapidly completed he [Christ] shall appoint the city to desolations. Daniel 9:26 LXXE

26 And after three score and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city [Jerusalem] and the sanctuary [the Temple]; and the end thereof (shall be) with a flood [Hebrew: deluge, 70AD], and to the end of the war desolations are determined. Daniel 9:26 KJV

27 And one week [7 years] shall establish the [New] covenant with many: and in the midst of the week [of 7 years] my [God’s] sacrifice and drink-offering shall be taken away: and on the temple shall be the abomination of desolations; and at the end of time an end shall be put to the desolation. Daniel 9:27 LXXE

27 And he [Christ] shall confirm the covenant with many for one week [7 years]: and in the midst of the week [of 7 years] he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make (it) desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured on the desolate. Daniel 9:27 KJV


The bold text are my emphases and the square brackets are my comments.

Reading through verses it is obvious that there have been changes/corruptions introduced into the MT which are carried through into the KJV translation.

Now lets look through these verses one by one.

The content of verse 24 is essentially the same in each version. The prophecy was fulfilled on the cross whereby Christ’s death and His shed blood brought in everlasting righteousness for those who put their trust in Him.

Also verse 25 is essentially the same. The English translation of the LXX uses “Christ” where the KJV translated from the MT uses “Messiah”. This could be because the LXX is in Greek and the MT in Hebrew. The word “Christ” derives from the Greek Χριστός (Christos) meaning the Anointed, who we know is Jesus the Christ. It has the same meaning as the Hebrew word translated “Messiah”.

In verse 26 both versions identify that the Anointed one, Christ, Messiah, shall be “destroyed” or “cut off”, meaning crucified. But there is a difference when it comes down to the identity of who “shall destroy the city and the sanctuary”.

The LXX clearly identifies the agent is Christ, the anointed one. He uses the “prince that is coming” who we know was the Roman Emperor Vespasian and his nephew General Titus in 70 AD destroyed the city of Jerusalem and pulled the Temple apart stone by stone. The LXX renders it in the direct voice whereas the MT puts it in the passive voice.

The MT version misses out completely that it is Christ who “shall destroy the city and the sanctuary”. It was he who “shall appoint the city to desolations” (verse 26).

The Romans were under His control. They were His armies sent to do God’s work. They destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple because of the Jews rejection of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. The LXX makes this very clear, whereas you have to interpolate it from the MT text (KJV in English).

Verse 27 is where we see significant differences. The covenant described there is the New Covenant established by Jesus Christ when He died on the cross as a once-for-all sacrifice for sin.

The covenant is not some 7-year peace agreement that Futurist Christian Zionists promote according to the Dispensational eschatology of John Nelson Darby and the Notes in the Scofield Reference Bible. The “he” in verse 27 of the KJV and at the end of verse 26 in the LXXE is Christ not some antichrist figure. The text of the LXXE is very clear on this. (Note, the verse division between verses 26 and 27 is different in LXXE and KJV.)

In Daniel chapter 9, verses 4-5, the text in both versions makes it clear what the covenant actually is.


Septuagint (LXXE)

4 And I prayed to the Lord my God, and confessed, and said, O Lord, the great and wonderful God, keeping thy covenant and thy mercy to them that love thee, and to them that keep thy commandments; we have sinned, 5 we have done iniquity, we have transgressed, and we have departed and turned aside from thy commandments and from thy judgments: Daniel 9:4-5 LXXE

Masoretic Text (KJV)

4 And I prayed unto the LORD my God, and made my confession, and said, O Lord, the great and dreadful God, keeping the covenant and mercy to them that love him, and to them that keep his commandments; 5 We have sinned, and have committed iniquity, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled, even by departing from thy precepts and from thy judgments: Daniel 9:4-5 KJV


The text of Daniel 9:27 LXXE uses the word “establish” whereas the MT based KJV uses the word “confirm”. Neither imply the implementation of a 7-year peace agreement. But the word “establish” has a stronger emphasis because of what Christ did on the cross was NOT a confirmation of the Old Covenant with the Jews. No, it was a completion or fulfillment of that Old Covenant and the establishment of a totally New Covenant, the covenant of grace. The New Covenant is Not Old Covenant Paperwork with New Ink

And to have access to the New Covenant Daniel 9:4 makes is patently clear that it is God who keeps His covenant with those who love Him and keep His commandments. Christ sacrifice on the cross was the ultimate act of love to mankind to provide salvation and redemption to those who love Him.

In both versions it is clear from Daniel 9:27 that the Jewish sacrifice ceases (drink offering, oblation) but the reason it ceases at the moment of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross is because there is no need of it anymore. Jesus made the final and only sacrifice that could pay the debt that we all owe the Father for our sin. His sacrifice was once for all and forever (Hebrews 7:27).

Therefore Temple worship became an abomination. The LXXE translates the LXX as “on the temple shall be the abomination of desolations“. As soon as Jesus paid the debt anything else is an abomination. The MT text translated into English (KJV and many others) muddies this completely. It has to be from corruption of the original Hebrew text. There is no explicit indication in the KJV version (verse 27) of this. The word “temple” is not used. Instead the KJV translators inserted the word “it”. You again have to infer that “it” means the temple.

From verse 27 of the KJV “the overspreading of abominations he shall make (it) desolate” one would have to infer the same meaning that the LXXE makes explicitly clear. You should identifiy the “he” there as Christ, but the Darby following Zionist Dispensationalists identify him as the antichrist.

This is the most profane of all interpretations — excising Christ and inserting the antichrist. Such contempt. Such blasphemy.

And changing Christ’s New Covenant of grace into a 7-year peace deal. But millions of Western, especially US, evangelicals support Dispensational Zionist end-time eschatology. They support the building of the 3rd Jewish Temple and the re-establishment of animals sacrifice for sins. What utter sacrilege in the face of Christ’s sacrifice.

I write this on Good Friday 2026, a day of memorial to Jesus Christ’s sacrifice and death on the cross. We should be reminded that He paid it all! No other sacrifices (of goats, sheep or cattle) or works of any kind (gift giving, especially of chocolate eggs and bunnies) can have an iota of an effect on your eternal soul.

Eternal life is only available through Jesus Christ (John 14:6). And once saved by Christ no one can snatch you out of His hand (John 10:28). This means that your soul’s eternal state is secure regardless of any earthly actions.


Related Reading


From now on most new posts will be Subscriber only. Most of those will be Free Subscriber posts. Please subscribe.

Free Subscribers

Subscribe to our Newsletters as a Free Subscriber and be notified by email. Just put your email address in the box at the bottom of your screen.

You’ll get an email each time we publish a new article. It is quick and easy to do and totally free. You only need do it once.


Premium Subscribers

Subscribe to our Newsletters as a Premium Subscribers at $5 USD/month or $30 USD/year (you choose). Cancel anytime.

Paid Premium Subscribers will get exclusive access to certain content I publish. That will only cost you a cup of coffee per month.

Also you’ll be able to download, for free, a PDF of my book Apocalypse Now and also a PDF of my book The Physics of Creation The Creator’s Ultimate Design for Earth.

You can download them from the link below.

This is how you can support my work. I have been publishing this website for 10 years now and up to 2024 I never asked for any support.

Press the button “Premium” on the front page to find a list of Premium content. Thanks so much to all supporters.


At a minimum, please join as a Free Subscriber. It’ll cost you nothing. It may also help me beat the shadow banning of some posts.


Comments Welcome Below

7 responses to “Daniel 9:24-27 | How the Septuagint Differs from the Masoretic Text on Prophecies About Christ”

  1. I agree with you that there is nothing in the prophecies of Daniel 9:24-27 that needs to be fulfilled after the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. That means there is no 7 year peace deal to look forward to.

    I suspect the main source of the confusion leading to those extra seven years comes from thinking that what is being counted in verse 24 (actual weeks of Jesus’ ministry) is the same as what is being counted in verse 25 (Sabbatical years or a set of seven years before Jesus’ ministry begins).

    In verse 24, we are talking about actual weeks of the ministry of Jesus beginning with His baptism in early 27 AD and ending with Pentecost of 28 AD. On the 63 week, in the middle of the week, he establishes the New Covenant with His death.

    In verse 25 we have 483 years or 69 Sabbatical years between 457 BC and 27 AD when Jesus’ ministry begins with His baptism by John. Note that 457 + 27 – 1 = 483 = (7 + 62) * 7. The minus 1 is due to overcounting a missing zero year when adding BC and AD years.

    Note that the destruction of the temple in 70 AD is 42 years after the crucifixion of Jesus in 28 AD if the above reckoning is correct. Since 42 = 7 * 6, both of these events parallel each other in terms of Sabbatical years. Indeed, they are both post-Sabbatical years.

    With the destruction of the temple in 70 AD, the Daniel 9:24-27 prophecies are completely fulfilled.

    Like

    1. The actual meaning of “week” from the Hebrew word shabua (MT) is “seven” so without interpretation the most you can say is 70 sevens or 70 sevened (a time period) to bring in “everlasting righteousness”, which from history we know happened on the cross. Of course the “seven” is taken to mean a week of years. Hebrew scholars take the passage as grammatically connected with verse 24 as a summary of verses 25-27. The latter 3 verses are all focused on the work of the Messiah so it is logical that they are expanding on verse 24.

      Further Evidence of the True Meaning of Who It Is in Daniel 9:27


      Even though your analysis is interesting I don’t believe that you can get away from sevens = years in verse 24.

      Daniel’s Seventy Weeks

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I agree with you that what I presented is an interpretation. I also think Jim Gibson described the dispensationalist view where the 70 weeks of verse 24 is 490 “years”, however, I am not a dispensationalist as neither are you.

        These two verses are not completely connected because verse 24 has 70 shabua, which I interpret as actual weeks of Jesus’ ministry along with Rood (who is also not a dispensationalist for other reasons), but verse 25 has only 69 shabua, which I interpret as Sabbatical years. Since 70 does not equal 69, they could be interpreted as counting different events. In my case, I see 70 weeks in the ministry of Jesus between His baptism and Pentecost and 69 Sabbaticals between Ezra leaving to build the second temple in 457 BC and the baptism of Jesus in 27 AD.

        They are connected in the sense that verse 25 breaks up the 69 Sabbaticals into a set of 7 and a set of 62 Sabbaticals. This parallels verse 26 where one discusses what happens after the 62nd week of Jesus’ ministry. Then comes the one week when the New Covenant is confirmed. That leaves 7 weeks until Pentecost. This is again a 62 and 7 pattern.

        I agree with you that the “he” of verse 27 refers to the “Messiah” (Jesus) of verses 25 and 26. The Temple sacrifices ended with the death of Jesus on the cross. Jesus also sent Titus to destroy the second temple in 70 AD. There is no “antichrist” involved. The week of verse 27 is the 63rd week of Jesus’ ministry which is when the crucifixion occurred according to Rood’s chronology.

        Rick Lanser of the Associates for Biblical Research in “The Daniel 9:24-27 Project” offered 1 Nisan 6 BC as the birth of Jesus following Jonathan Cahn. However, he favored 30 AD as the year of the crucifixion rather than 28 AD. I think the argument he gives to reject 33 AD also eliminates 30 AD which leaves 28 AD as the only remaining date. If 28 AD is correct, then Jesus was 33 years old when He was crucified.

        I wondered how Revelation fit into this and found a two part lecture by Steve Gregg on YouTube called “Revelation: Four Views”. The four views are the Idealist, the Futurist, the Historicist and the Preterist. He claims to be a Preterist/Idealist. The prophesied events of Revelation were mostly fulfilled in 70 AD with the destruction of the temple implying John wrote Revelation around 66 AD.

        Blessings and Happy Resurrection Sunday!

        Like

      2. Frank, Thanks and happy resurrection Sunday to you also.

        I believe Jim Gibson is a Preterist, so I’d be surprised to learn he follows dispensationalism. Perhaps you misunderstood that he was quoting a dispensationalist viewpoint, not that he was agreeing with it. In this piece

        Daniel’s Seventy Weeks

        I appreciate your input, as always. Diverse opinions and expression is important, especially on these matters.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. I should add that Sir Isaac Newton separated the two periods of 62 weeks and 7 weeks to precede the first and second comings of Christ. The last week he had appended to the 62 weeks as the period of Christ’s ministry but with a twist. He divided the 7 years into two 3.5 year periods with 3.5 years leading up to the crucifixion and another 3.5 years leading up the destruction of the Temple.
        I made a timeline based mostly on those views

        Daniel 9 Prophecy


        Towards the bottom of the page.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. @Frank Hubeny – ezra did not return to jerusalem to build the temple. he went there 60 years later if im not mistaken. and id be wary about anything cahn said.

    Like

    1. I would not believe anything Cahn said. He is a Judaizer.

      Like

Leave a comment

Trending