Update 30 June 2021: I no longer recommend this cosmogony. There were too many internal inconsistencies in the cosmology I used which came from Moshe Carmeli. And no 5D solution for the universe was ever found. The book is still good for laying out the arguments and problems that need to be solved. But I have moved on. I recommend Jason Lisle’s ASC model as the best approach to solve the creationist starlight travel time problem. See Recommended Resources at the bottom
Modern astronomy describes a universe that is billions of light-years in extent. If we reasonably assume that a light-year is the distance that light travels in one year at one light-year per year and that the speed of light has been a constant over all time since the creation of the Universe then creationists have a problem, don’t they? Since the Universe was created only a mere 6 thousand years ago how can light travel billions of light-years? This is called a light-travel-time problem.
Despite increasingly compelling arguments from biblical creationists that offer solutions to this problem, still many doubt the Bible’s clear timescale. This is because, they think, it is impossible for light to have reached Earth in only a few thousand years from galaxies that are billions of light-years away. This misconception is often the ultimate stumbling block to a straightforward acceptance of the Bible—even the gospel itself.
This book, Starlight, Time, and the New Physics, provides one such solution and it is summarized below. But before proceeding know this, the most accepted model describing the origin of the universe in the hot big bang also has a light-travel-time problem. This is called the horizon problem. See my blog, Big bang has a light-travel-time problem.
Starlight, Time and the New Physics describes the development of new physics based upon an extension to Einstein’s theory of relativity. Einstein’s theory applies very well to compact structures where gravity is strong but for large structures the size of galaxies and larger where gravity is weak there seems to be something missing. In the 1990s Prof. Moshe Carmeli of Ben Gurion University (Israel) built on the work of Einstein by adding a new dimension to the Universe—the velocity of the expansion of the fabric of space.
This new theory applies not only to galaxies, and clusters of galaxies but to the Universe as a whole. It was discovered that when one used this approach one could described the observations without the need to add dark matter and dark energy—two fudge factors that are essential to modern ΛCDM big bang theory.
Carmeli’s theory may be equally well applied to the infinite, unbounded universe that is currently in vogue in the standard model as well as to a finite, bounded universe with a unique centre. This has the added benefit, though not essential for the model, that it applies to a galactocentric universe—that is, to a universe where our Galaxy is somewhere near the centre on a cosmological scale. My research so far, and it is ongoing, indicates that our Galaxy could possibly be about 100 million light-years from the centre of a great structure of galaxies arrayed on shells with a spacing of several hundred million light years.
See left figure of a slice of about 50,000 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey with concentric shells (rings) shown. This is a survey that creates a map of the locations of the galaxies around us in space. The map shows galaxies out to a few billion light-years. Each tiny dot represents a galaxy. It is actually 3-dimensional but only a slice is shown here; two wedge like sections from the survey look above and below the plane of our Galaxy. The areas where no galaxies appear is only because they were not mapped in those regions because dust in our own Galaxy obscures the view of the distant universe in these directions.
Bible-believers should not find this to be surprising, as the Bible suggests (Ps 147:4) that the Universe is finite and if finite, then it could have an edge and a unique centre. But the idea is strongly resisted by many cosmologists who are unwilling to accept the possibility that our galaxy, at least, and mankind hold a special place in God’s creative purposes.
Carmeli’s cosmology describes an accelerating expanding universe. I appropriated his model and applied it to Day 4 of Creation week and posited, because Genesis 1 tells us that God created the cosmos on that day, that God enormously accelerated the expansion rate of the fabric of space over the 24-hours of Day 4 as he stretched out the cosmos with the galaxies in it. And at the end of Day 4 he stopped the acceleration of the expansion.
There are scriptures that apparently describe God spreading or stretching out the cosmos. See, for example, Ps. 104:2; Isa. 40:22; 42:5; 44:24. Since writing the book though I have realized that those scriptures do not describe the type of expansion of at least a thousand fold that is needed. A tent or canopy just does not expand that much. Nevertheless, while Scripture does not overtly support the idea of cosmological expansion it does not deny the possibility.
From the model it was discovered that, as a result of the very rapid acceleration of the cosmos, the physics (namely causality) necessitates that cosmic clocks ‘tick’ extremely fast compared to Earth-based clocks. This is what we call time dilation. It is as if the Earth clocks ‘tick’ only once for every trillion ‘ticks’ on cosmic clocks. This, then, provides all the necessary time needed (billions of years when measured by cosmic clocks) for light to travel the vast distances of the universe, even billions of light-years, in a matter of a single 24-hour day as measured by Earth clocks.
So that’s the important question. Which clocks is God referring to when He is talking about the Creation days of Genesis 1? I believe Earth clocks. The whole creation is focused on Earth. It is all about this planet and man. God’s attention is wholly focused on His Creation here.
Thus light, which arrives on Earth today, was emitted from galaxies at distances of even tens of billions of light-years away. Indeed, all light outside a distance of roughly 6 thousand light-years must be coming from Creation week. That means we are looking back in time to Creation Day 4 when God created the stars and galaxies in the cosmos. The heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament shows His handiwork (Psalms 19:1).
The book can be ordered from CMI or Amazon.com, or some Christian bookstores. There are seven chapters (111 pages), which present the background to and the ideas of the new model to describe the origin of nearly everything we see in the Universe. There are very few equations but necessarily the content assumes some knowledge of astronomical terms. Nevertheless a glossary is included at the end of the book. This is the main section of the book intended for the average educated reader. In addition, there are six appendices (106 pages), which provide in-depth discussions and a full mathematical development necessary to support the model.
- Book: Dismantling the Big Bang: God’s Universe Rediscovered
- Anisotropic Synchrony Convention —A Solution to the Distant Starlight Problem
- Distant Starlight: The Anisotropic Synchrony Convention
- Can we see into the past?
- The Anisotropic Synchrony Convention model as a solution to the creationist starlight-travel-time problem — Part I
- The Anisotropic Synchrony Convention model as a solution to the creationist starlight-travel-time problem — Part II
- Einstein’s physics says there is no biblical creationist starlight travel-time problem
- Starlight and time: Is it a brick wall for biblical creation?
- The conventionality thesis on the synchronisation of clocks separated by distance
- Questions on the conventionality thesis and the one-way speed of light
- DVD: Hubble Bubble Big Bang in Trouble
2 replies on “A solution to the creationist starlight-travel-time problem”
I’m very intrigued seeing another model: the Einstein-Carmeli-Hartnett model. Would like to remember it this way 🙂
Just to make sure, the model states that time dilation was applied earlier during day 4 for light to reach Earth and then at the end of day 4, all the clocks were somewhat synchronised?
Yes, that is essentially correct.