Part 2 of series “Redshifts and the Universe”
Watch Part 1 here.
Edwin Hubble’s observations in 1929 led to the conclusion that the universe is expanding, but is that the correct interpretation of extra-galactic redshifts? The standard big bang model derived by Friedmann and Lemaitre gave Hubble a solution to his dilemma but did he really believe that cosmological expansion was the correct interpretation for the redshifts he observed? Clearly he did not believe in the Creator and was repulsed at the idea that the universe might have a unique centre and that we might be somewhere near that.
- Video: REDSHIFTS AND THE UNIVERSE
- DVD: Hubble, Bubble: Big Bang in Trouble
- UNIVERSE: STATIC OR EXPANDING
- HUBBLE: DOES OUR GALAXY OCCUPY A SPECIAL PLACE IN THE UNIVERSE?
- IS THERE DEFINITIVE EVIDENCE FOR AN EXPANDING UNIVERSE?
- Does observational evidence indicate the universe is expanding?—part 1: the case for time dilation
- Does observational evidence indicate the universe is expanding?—part 2: the case against expansion
- J.G. Hartnett, Is the Universe really expanding?, http://arxiv.org/pdf/1107.2485v2.pdf
- DOES THE BIBLE REALLY DESCRIBE EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE?